No not unless they have a health condition that would require them to take d 600.
It really depends on your speed. If you were traveling at the speed of light, it would take 600 years. 600 light years equals 3,527,175,223,910,165 miles. So divide that by the speed you would be traveling to get the length of time it would take you.
It really depends on your speed. If you were traveling at the speed of light, it would take 600 years. 600 light years equals 3,527,175,223,910,165 miles. So divide that by the speed you would be traveling to get the length of time it would take you.
With current technology, it would take NASA thousands of years to travel 600 light years using conventional spacecraft. The vast distance and limitations of our current propulsion systems make such a journey unfeasible in a reasonable timescale.
300 billlion years
Traveling 600 million light years would take an impossibly long time, considering the current limits of our technology. Even traveling at the speed of light (which is not feasible for matter with mass), it would still take 600 million years to cover that distance. The vastness of space makes interstellar travel on such a scale unrealistic with our current knowledge and technology.
There are 50 years in 600 months .
20131848.6872 years20131848.6872 years
600 years = 1.89341556 × 1010 seconds
600 light-years is 37,944,646.2 AU
Assuming a constant speed of 600 mph, it would take approximately 17.6 trillion years to reach the Andromeda Galaxy, which is about 2.537 million light-years away from Earth. This calculation accounts for the vast distance and the limitations of current technology.
It took 600 people and 14 years to build the Brooklyn Bridge.
me!