Cooperative schedulingPreemptive scheduling Rate-monotonic schedulingRound-robin schedulingFixed priority pre-emptive scheduling, an implementation of preemptive time slicingFixed-Priority Scheduling with Deferred PreemptionFixed-Priority Non-preemptive SchedulingCritical section preemptive schedulingStatic time schedulingEarliest Deadline First approachStochastic digraphs with multi-threaded graph traversal
this is my doubt about the non-preemptive priority scheduling. i m doing bachelor of engineering in IT and this question in end semester exam. the question is as follows:Assume you have the following jobs to be executed with one processor, with the jobs arriving in the order listed here:Process Burst Time PriorityP1 80 5P2 20 1P3 10 3P4 20 2P5 50 4Suppose the system uses priority scheduling. Draw Gantt chart and calculate average waiting time for the processes.My doubt is:suppose if we were to use non-preemptive priority scheduling, the question says the jobs arriving in the order listed, so as per the order P1 will arrive first so it will get the CPU first and in non-preemptive once a job gets CPU it will not leave CPU till the process finishes, then as per the order P2 will come and same thing repeats.... so it acts like FCFS scheduling and priority is of no use here. But my lecturer says we have to follow the priority and P2 will come first, but the line the jobs arriving in the order listed is still not letting me agree with my lecturer. Can anyone help out?
Windows 95
By far the simplest CPU-scheduling algorithm is the first-come, first-served (FCFS) scheduling algorithm. With this scheme, the process that requests the CPU first is allocated the CPU first. The implementation of the FCFS policy is easily managed with a FIFO queue. When a process enters the ready queue, its PCB is linked onto the tail of the queue. When the CPU is free, it is allocated to the process at the head of the queue. The running process is then removed from the queue. The code for FCFS scheduling is simple to write and understand. The average waiting time under the FCFS policy, however, is often quite long. Consider the following set of processes that arrive at time 0, with the length of the CPU-burst time given in milliseconds:
SJhortest job First
FIFO (first in first out)
Cooperative schedulingPreemptive scheduling Rate-monotonic schedulingRound-robin schedulingFixed priority pre-emptive scheduling, an implementation of preemptive time slicingFixed-Priority Scheduling with Deferred PreemptionFixed-Priority Non-preemptive SchedulingCritical section preemptive schedulingStatic time schedulingEarliest Deadline First approachStochastic digraphs with multi-threaded graph traversal
Tasks are usually assigned with priorities. At times it is necessary to run a certain task that has a higher priority before another task although it is running. Therefore, the running task is interrupted for some time and resumed later when the priority task has finished its execution. This is called preemptive scheduling.Eg: Round robinIn non-preemptive scheduling, a running task is executed till completion. It cannot be interrupted.Eg First In First Out
In one process ( Start time (of the second) - Finish time (of the first) ) - Arrival time If the process is not broken up into different arrival times, then ignore and stick to starting time - arrival time
In preemptive multitasking scheduling processes , scheduler can interrupt one running process and and allocate CUP to another process without letting the complete the task of first process. Window 95 introduced preemptive scheduling and Mac also uses this scheduling process. Bharat Rawal
It depends of whether the current process will give up CPU to a task in the waiting state that will execute faster than itself. In this case it would be preemptive, else it would not be.
this is my doubt about the non-preemptive priority scheduling. i m doing bachelor of engineering in IT and this question in end semester exam. the question is as follows:Assume you have the following jobs to be executed with one processor, with the jobs arriving in the order listed here:Process Burst Time PriorityP1 80 5P2 20 1P3 10 3P4 20 2P5 50 4Suppose the system uses priority scheduling. Draw Gantt chart and calculate average waiting time for the processes.My doubt is:suppose if we were to use non-preemptive priority scheduling, the question says the jobs arriving in the order listed, so as per the order P1 will arrive first so it will get the CPU first and in non-preemptive once a job gets CPU it will not leave CPU till the process finishes, then as per the order P2 will come and same thing repeats.... so it acts like FCFS scheduling and priority is of no use here. But my lecturer says we have to follow the priority and P2 will come first, but the line the jobs arriving in the order listed is still not letting me agree with my lecturer. Can anyone help out?
Non pre-emptive means once CPU starts executing one process, it will not be taken out of the CPU until it is terminated or it has to wait for some event. In preemptive SJF scheduling, current running process is moved to the ready queue when a new process with a shorter CPU burst joins the ready queue.
in pre emptive scheduling. a limited time period is fixed for every process in the CPU. no matter whether the process is completed or not ... the resource assinged to it will be taken back back abd will be given to the next process in the queue.while in non preemptive the resorces are with a process untill it finishes completely others wait for their turn till then. this kind of scheduling has a high probability of going into a deadlock.
Preemptive war, or preemptive anything, is where you strike first instead of waiting to be struck. Larger countries tend to let themselves be struck first, while smaller countries tend to strike preemptively.
It means to do something first. Such as attacking the enemy before you think they are about to attack you, i.e.' "We did a preemptive strike against the enemy."
single precision