there are many examples of guilt and innocence throughout this tragic love story. An innocent young girl falls in love with a member of the family that is the sworn enemies of her family. There are many battles and mistakes that cause people to feel guilty and be portrayed as guilty. The ones who help Juliet and Romeo marry behind the backs of their families feel guilty because they feel as thought they have the blood of the dead lovers on their hands once the plan backfires and Romeo and Juliet commit suicide in order to be together. These are just a few small examples that show innocence and guilt. in reality, the play is filled with these.
The only suspect in Romeo and Juliet is Romeo, suspected of killing Tybalt, of which he was totally guilty. Nobody proves his innocence in this play.
I think Baz Lurhman was trying to prove that even though romeo and Juliet was written a long time ago the characters and themes relate to anybody, anytime.
6: The servants Sampson and Gregory of the Capulets fight the servants Balthasar and Abram of the Montegues. Benvolio Montegue fights Tybalt Capulet. Mercutio Montegue fights Tybalt Capulet. Romeo Montegue fights Tybalt Capulet. Romeo Montegue fights Paris Escalus.
Friar Lawrence says this when Romeo comes to him to arrange a marriage between himself and Juliet.
I think this is referring to this bit of dialogue: Romeo: Lady, by yonder blessed moon I swear... Juliet: O, swear not by the moon [ ... ] lest thy love prove likewise variable. In other words, she's not telling him not to swear his love, she's telling him "Don't swear on the moon. It changes. I don't want a love that waxes and wanes." If you meant something else, please be more specific.
Romeo refers to the Friar as his "ghostly sire" (2.2.188), so it appears that the Friar is Romeo's confessor. Also, when they speak, the Friar chides him about his yearning for Rosaline, so apparently the Friar is someone to whom the Friar has turned to for advice about love.
Aliens.
I think Baz Lurhman was trying to prove that even though romeo and Juliet was written a long time ago the characters and themes relate to anybody, anytime.
The line "For this alliance may so happy prove to turn your households' rancor to pure love" is spoken by Friar Laurence in William Shakespeare's play "Romeo and Juliet." He is expressing hope that the marriage between Romeo and Juliet will reconcile their feuding families.
6: The servants Sampson and Gregory of the Capulets fight the servants Balthasar and Abram of the Montegues. Benvolio Montegue fights Tybalt Capulet. Mercutio Montegue fights Tybalt Capulet. Romeo Montegue fights Tybalt Capulet. Romeo Montegue fights Paris Escalus.
Friar Lawrence says this when Romeo comes to him to arrange a marriage between himself and Juliet.
Juliet asks for Romeo to prove his love by making a sincere commitment to her through marriage. She wants him to solidify their relationship and show that his feelings are true and lasting.
when there is enough evidence to prove it
ROMEO AND JULIET, Act 2, Scene 2
Please rephrase the question to understandability.
Baz Luhrmann set "Romeo and Juliet" in a modern setting to make the story more relevant and accessible to contemporary audiences. By using a near-present setting, he was able to explore themes of love, violence, and family conflict in a way that felt familiar and relatable to modern viewers.
In the US - defendants are not required to PROVE their innocence. However - if you are involved in a court action you would have already been indicted due to the existence of probable cause that you WERE involved in the offense. Then - instead of proving your innocence, you would have to present proof that you are NOT GUILTY.
I think this is referring to this bit of dialogue: Romeo: Lady, by yonder blessed moon I swear... Juliet: O, swear not by the moon [ ... ] lest thy love prove likewise variable. In other words, she's not telling him not to swear his love, she's telling him "Don't swear on the moon. It changes. I don't want a love that waxes and wanes." If you meant something else, please be more specific.