answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The acting companies in Shakespeare's day consisted of a certain numbers of sharers or partners in the company (approximately eight), who performed in all the plays put on by the company, apprentices, young boys (at least two) who played the parts of boys and young women, and hired men who were paid a straight wage and were hired for the performance. Of course it made financial sense to keep the number of actors as low as possible, because it meant less money spent on wages and more for the sharers, so part doubling was a regular practise (as it still is, although to a lesser extent). Thomas Platter, the Swiss diarist who went to see Julius Caesar at the Globe in 1599, said that the cast consisted of about 15 actors. William A. Ringler Jr. estimated the necessary complement of actors (including walk-ons or mutes) at sixteen; John C. Meagher has calculated that thirteen speaking actors could perform most of Shakespeare's plays. Although the First Folio lists 26 names as "the principal actors in all these plays", only some of the actors named there would have been in the company at any one time: Kempe and Armin, for example, are both listed, yet they did not appear on stage in the same production. The estimates of 13 to 16 actors are probably accurate.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

It is not clear, since the personnel in the companies changed all the time, and they could supplement their number with hired actors for a particular play. Some theorists have worked out that with appropriate part doublings, Shakespeare's plays could be played by a company of about thirteen actors.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How many actors were there in the earliest acting companies in shakespeare?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Performing Arts

How were Shakespeare's actors chosen?

All acting companies in Shakespeare's day had a permanent roster of players. Shakespeare did not write a play and then choose the actors for it; he had the actors and wrote the play for them. It is possible to see the difference between the parts written for Will Kempe when he was the company funnyman and the parts written for Robert Armin when he replaced Kempe.


Who did shakespeare change his companies name in honor of?

Elizabethan acting companies took the names of their patrons--by law, no acting company could exist unless it was sponsored by a noble or royal patron. This was automatic; neither Shakespeare nor anyone else could change the name of the company. The name of the company did not "honor" anyone, it showed who was giving the actors legal protection.


How were the names of William Shakespeare's two acting companies chosen?

Just to make it clear, Shakespeare was associated with only one acting company for almost all of his career. It was the only company he was actually a partner in. But it did have two names. The reason for this is that the names for acting companies in Shakespeare's day were never chosen by anyone. It's not like nowadays where if you start an acting company you can call it anything you want. In those days the name of your company was the name of your patron. Period. If you changed patron, or if the patron changed his name or his job, your company's name would change, and you had nothing to say about it. If a group of actors in Shakespeare's day tried to say "We're the Happy Day Players", they would get a visit from the police who would say "Happy Day Players, eh? That means you have no patron" and throw them all in jail.


What was the name of Shakespeare second acting group?

We are not exactly sure which acting company Shakespeare started his career with: Queen Elizabeth's Men, Lord Strange's Men, Suffolk's Men, Pembroke's Men or Derby's Men have all been mentioned as possible acting companies Shakespeare worked for before 1594. He may have worked for all of them for all we know. But what we do know is that in 1594 Shakespeare was made a partner in a new company made up mostly of actors from Lord Strange's men, and it is this company which Shakespeare worked with for the next twenty years or so, although the personnel and even the name of the company changed from time to time. It is known usually as the Lord Chamberlain's Men or the King's Men, but it was throughout the same company. So it is impossible to say which acting group was Shakespeare's second, but it is certain that the Chamberlain's/King's Men was his last.


Who play in Shakespeare's roles and why?

Actors inevitably play the roles in Shakespeare's plays, although some roles nowadays are played by actresses. Sometimes these are professional actors who earn their money this way, and sometimes they are amateurs who have a different day job. Either way, people who are not in interested in acting rarely play Shakespeare's roles (or indeed any roles).

Related questions

How many actors were there in the earliest acting companies?

There were less than 100 actors in the earliest acting companies. Most started out very small but quickly grew as the demand for actors greatly increased.


How many actors were in the earliest acting companies?

There were less than 100 actors in the earliest acting companies. Most started out very small but quickly grew as the demand for actors greatly increased.


How many companies were there in the earliest acting?

There were less than 100 actors in the earliest acting companies. Most started out very small but quickly grew as the demand for actors greatly increased.


How were Shakespeare's actors chosen?

All acting companies in Shakespeare's day had a permanent roster of players. Shakespeare did not write a play and then choose the actors for it; he had the actors and wrote the play for them. It is possible to see the difference between the parts written for Will Kempe when he was the company funnyman and the parts written for Robert Armin when he replaced Kempe.


Who played Shakespeare's roles and why?

Actors played all of Shakespeare's roles, because they were trained in acting.


Were Shakespeare's costumes ignored by acting companies?

Shakespeare did not own any costumes, so "Shakespeare's costumes" doesn't mean anything. If you mean the specific and detailed instructions he gave in his scripts as to what the actors ought to wear, there aren't any. Usually Shakespeare left no instructions as to how anyone was to be costumed.


Who did shakespeare change his companies name in honor of?

Elizabethan acting companies took the names of their patrons--by law, no acting company could exist unless it was sponsored by a noble or royal patron. This was automatic; neither Shakespeare nor anyone else could change the name of the company. The name of the company did not "honor" anyone, it showed who was giving the actors legal protection.


Who paid William Shakespeare per work?

Those playwrights who were not also actors were paid per work by the acting companies that put their plays on. But at least after 1594, Shakespeare did not sell his plays in this way. Instead, his own acting company put them on and he had a share in the profits. In this way, Shakespeare was able to earn a decent living, unlike most playwrights of the time.


What theaters have Shakespeare's plays performed at them?

Most theatres that are not specifically dedicated to one kind of entertainment will, sooner or later, find themselves home to a play by Shakespeare. That is because Shakespeare's plays are so popular that most acting companies want to put them on, and most actors want to play in them.


Which theater was built in England for Shakespeare's group of actors?

The Globe Theatre was not only designed by actors and intended for actors but was also paid for by the Lord Chamberlain's Men, Shakespeare's acting company.


What happened when shakespeare's actors didn't have a license?

What do you mean, "Shakespeare's actors"? Shakespeare did not own actors. He did not hire actors. He was an actor himself, as well as a writer. There was not a "licence" to act as we would understand it. Playing companies of the day had to have a noble or royal patron, like the Lord Chamberlain, or the Lord Admiral, or the King, or the Queen. If they didn't, they risked being prosecuted as vagrants. Shakespeare always worked in legit companies of this nature as did all of the actors he associated with.


How were the names of William Shakespeare's two acting companies chosen?

Just to make it clear, Shakespeare was associated with only one acting company for almost all of his career. It was the only company he was actually a partner in. But it did have two names. The reason for this is that the names for acting companies in Shakespeare's day were never chosen by anyone. It's not like nowadays where if you start an acting company you can call it anything you want. In those days the name of your company was the name of your patron. Period. If you changed patron, or if the patron changed his name or his job, your company's name would change, and you had nothing to say about it. If a group of actors in Shakespeare's day tried to say "We're the Happy Day Players", they would get a visit from the police who would say "Happy Day Players, eh? That means you have no patron" and throw them all in jail.