False. Lots of characters speak in prose when they are not saying something serious, or when they are upset or disturbed. Note Hamlet (a Prince) in his entire conversation with Osric and Horatio in Act 5 Scene 2. Or Lear (a King) when talking in his madness with the blind Gloucester in Act 4 Scene 6.
by having noble characters speak in iambic pentameter, while the lower classes spoke in plain blank verse or prose.
Shakespeare had most of his characters speak in blank verse. He went into prose when the characters were of a lower class, or where the character is comic. For example, the Porter in Macbeth speaks in prose, when the rest speak in verse. The witches have a tendency to rhyme as well.
Generally (but not always!) Shakespeare's characters who spoke in blank verse are the lower-status characters. Think of which characters are not as important, then compare that to some of their speech in Romeo and Juliet.
This is a very simplistic question, because the distinction was clearly maintained in real life and that was only carried forward into Shakespeare's plays. The most obvious difference between people of different social classes was their clothes. People were forbidden by law to dress in certain ways unless they were rich and noble enough. The costumes used in the plays showed this: the actors playing noble people wore fine clothing (the castoffs of the real nobility). The other difference between upper and lower class people is the way they talk. Shakespeare often puts stately blank verse in the mouths of the upper crust and arrhythmic prose in the mouths of the common people. But not always. Even the nobility speak in prose when they are disturbed or insane, and they speak in prose all the way through Much Ado About Nothing. Prince Hal talks in prose when talking to Ned Poins. Blank verse is saved for matters of seriousness where a more poetic approach is needed. It is not therefore a matter of social class so much as a matter of the weightiness of what is being said (and in Shakespeare the lower classes rarely have anything worthwhile to say).
This is a very simplistic question, because the distinction was clearly maintained in real life and that was only carried forward into Shakespeare's plays. The most obvious difference between people of different social classes was their clothes. People were forbidden by law to dress in certain ways unless they were rich and noble enough. The costumes used in the plays showed this: the actors playing noble people wore fine clothing (the castoffs of the real nobility). The other difference between upper and lower class people is the way they talk. Shakespeare often puts stately blank verse in the mouths of the upper crust and arrhythmic prose in the mouths of the common people. But not always. Even the nobility speak in prose when they are disturbed or insane, and they speak in prose all the way through Much Ado About Nothing. Prince Hal talks in prose when talking to Ned Poins. Blank verse is saved for matters of seriousness where a more poetic approach is needed. It is not therefore a matter of social class so much as a matter of the weightiness of what is being said (and in Shakespeare the lower classes rarely have anything worthwhile to say).
No, members of the lower classes are not the only ones who speak in prose instead of blank verse. In literature, prose is often used to depict everyday speech and dialogue, while blank verse is a form of poetry without rhyme. The use of prose or blank verse can vary depending on the character, the context, and the style of the writing.
by having noble characters speak in iambic pentameter, while the lower classes spoke in plain blank verse or prose.
Shakespeare had most of his characters speak in blank verse. He went into prose when the characters were of a lower class, or where the character is comic. For example, the Porter in Macbeth speaks in prose, when the rest speak in verse. The witches have a tendency to rhyme as well.
as Mohandas Ganghi concerned about his lower classes
Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.
The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.
upper classes, lower classes , middle classes, and slaves
it concerned all of the classes.
it concerned all of the classes.
Members of the federalist party tended to be former Revolutionary War officers, merchants, financiers, and landed aristocracy. They believed that the lower classes should defer to elites.
They are people who are part of the lower classes in society-working classes
Lower classes often live in affordable housing options such as apartments, subsidized housing, or low-income neighborhoods with lower property values. These areas may have limited access to resources and opportunities compared to more affluent neighborhoods.