Arthur Miller might think that a working woman facing prejudice in a male-dominated business world would make a good modern tragic hero.
He faces the problem that he might be dismissed from his job.
his economic losses during the great depression
If Arthur Miller had not embellished the truth in his play, the narrative would likely be more straightforward and reflective of actual events without the dramatic flair. The characters might appear less complex, and the themes of moral ambiguity and societal pressures would be less pronounced. This could lead to a diminished emotional impact on the audience, as the heightened stakes and personal conflicts that arise from Miller's embellishments are crucial in engaging viewers. Ultimately, the play might lose its powerful critique of human nature and social responsibility.
Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible to explain to the US people about the tactics "if you're not with us your against us" of Senator McCarthy, who fostered a "witch hunt" against Americans who were communists. Americans were afraid of communism, which he represented as the witches in The Crucible. Miller thought that the audience might see their own times, their own fears and dilemmas reflected in the themes of the crucible.
Arthur Miller’s personal weakness could be seen as his struggle with self-doubt and the weight of his own ideals. Despite his success, he often grappled with feelings of inadequacy and questioned the impact of his work, particularly in the face of societal pressures and personal relationships. This internal conflict may have influenced his writing, leading to profound explorations of morality and human flaws, reflecting his own vulnerabilities.
Today, Arthur Miller might think that a working woman facing prejudice in a male-dominated business word would make the best modern tragic hero.
He faces the problem that he might be dismissed from his job.
his economic losses during the great depression
If Arthur Miller had not embellished the truth in his play, the narrative would likely be more straightforward and reflective of actual events without the dramatic flair. The characters might appear less complex, and the themes of moral ambiguity and societal pressures would be less pronounced. This could lead to a diminished emotional impact on the audience, as the heightened stakes and personal conflicts that arise from Miller's embellishments are crucial in engaging viewers. Ultimately, the play might lose its powerful critique of human nature and social responsibility.
a tragic hero needs to be of high birth, he needs to have a tragic flaw which might be pride, arrogance or simply lack of insight which brings about his downfall.
Arthur Miller may have written the play to explore the themes of guilt, betrayal, and redemption in American society. Additionally, the play serves as an allegory for the Red Scare and McCarthyism that were prevalent during that time period. Miller may have also wanted to shed light on the dangers of hysteria and the importance of standing up for one's beliefs.
Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible to explain to the US people about the tactics "if you're not with us your against us" of Senator McCarthy, who fostered a "witch hunt" against Americans who were communists. Americans were afraid of communism, which he represented as the witches in The Crucible. Miller thought that the audience might see their own times, their own fears and dilemmas reflected in the themes of the crucible.
A very common universal theme is the Tragic Hero; a protagonist whom, although brave and heroic and fighting on the side of Good, is nevertheless flawed in a tragic way that will spell his doom. The obstacles that he faces are symbolic of the culture in which he exists. Examples are Oedipus, Jason (of the Argonauts), Achilles, King Arthur, and Anakin Skywalker.
Arthur Miller’s personal weakness could be seen as his struggle with self-doubt and the weight of his own ideals. Despite his success, he often grappled with feelings of inadequacy and questioned the impact of his work, particularly in the face of societal pressures and personal relationships. This internal conflict may have influenced his writing, leading to profound explorations of morality and human flaws, reflecting his own vulnerabilities.
Creon's tragic flaw is hubris, thinking he can set the laws of human beings above the laws of the gods.
I'm not sure that "advice" is what's needed here. "A good smack upside the head" might do more good. Still, if I had to choose something... "Don't be an idiot" is always good advice.
You might want to check out the work of Henrik Ibsen who, in the nineteenth century, led a movement away from melodrama and the comedy of manners and toward more realism on stage.