He was a good man. He was compassionate, and did not want to cause unnecessary death. He was altruistic and was more concerned for the well-being of his country than for increasing his own power. If these are flaws, then Jesus had the same flaws.
When you look at it this way, there is a lot to be said for the idea that there is no such thing as a "tragic flaw". Bad things don't happen to people in tragedies because they are flawed, or not in good tragedies anyway. Bad things happen to them because they are in the wrong place at the wrong time. Being "the noblest Roman of them all" would normally have made Brutus a hero, as it made his ancestor a hero. But he lived at a time when he was surrounded by cynical, two-faced, devious, grasping and selfish people like Cassius and Antony, and his tragic virtues (they are not flaws) were out of place.
Brutus' flaw is his naivete because he easily trusts Cassius and the other conspirators. He also thinks that the conspirators are killing Caesar for the same reason as him (which is for the good of Rome).
Would it surprise you to know that it didn't? Maybe Brutus did not have a "tragic flaw". He made some errors in judgement of course,but they were mostly because he was "the noblestRoman of them all" which I hope you don't think is some kind of defect.
Brutus lacked judgment. In the story/play he thought that all men were honorable and trustworthy. He was laterd proved wrong by Cassius.
They both commited suicide due to realizing that they were losing the battle against Antony and Octavius at Phillipi. They are different because Cassius didn't neede to beg anyone to kill him his slave Pindarus had no trouble killing Cassius because it meant he was free from his rule and Cassius wouldn't be missed by most where as Brutus had to beg his soldiers to kill him because Brutus was an honorable man and prior to the speech of Antony at Caesar's funeral, was beloved by by the Romans.eventually the slave named Clitus allowed Brutus to run upon his sword.
Brutus's tragic flaw of idealism leads him to believe that he can create a just and noble society through his actions, particularly in the assassination of Caesar. This unwavering commitment to his principles blinds him to the complexities of human nature and the political landscape, causing him to underestimate the consequences of his choices. His idealism ultimately results in misjudgments and alienation from those around him, contributing to his downfall as he faces the chaos and betrayal that follow. In the end, his noble intentions lead to tragedy and the collapse of the very ideals he sought to uphold.
1) Idealism 2) Perfectionism 3) maybe naivety 4) poor judgment 5) his honour 6) thrust 7) gullibility
Brutus' flaw is his naivete because he easily trusts Cassius and the other conspirators. He also thinks that the conspirators are killing Caesar for the same reason as him (which is for the good of Rome).
Would it surprise you to know that it didn't? Maybe Brutus did not have a "tragic flaw". He made some errors in judgement of course,but they were mostly because he was "the noblestRoman of them all" which I hope you don't think is some kind of defect.
no
they both have a tragic hero with a tragic flaw in JC: Brutus; whos tragic flaw is his naivity In TFA: Okonkwo; who tragic flaw is being like his father (being feminine)
Brutus lacked judgment. In the story/play he thought that all men were honorable and trustworthy. He was laterd proved wrong by Cassius.
Had he given in to Cassius's much more realpolitik suggestions, they would have bumped off Antony at the same time as Caesar and have consolidated their positions in Rome. But if Brutus had been that kind of a guy, Cassius would not have recruited him as an ally in the first place. If idealism is a "tragic flaw" in Brutus, then isn't it also a "tragic flaw" in Jesus? If he had only co-operated with the Sanhedrin and the Romans he wouldn't have been crucified, right? But I think Jesus would have said that his ideals were more important than not getting killed, and I think Brutus (at least in the way Shakespeare portrayed him) would have said the same. Curiously, Dante portrays Brutus as a villain because he betrayed his friend and benefactor. Would treachery make more sense as a tragic flaw?
According to Aristotle, a tragic hero's flaw is known as hamartia, which is often translated as a "tragic flaw" or mistake in judgment. This flaw leads to the hero's downfall and is typically related to their own character traits or actions.
The fatal flaw that the hero in a tragedy possesses is typically known as their "hamartia," which is a tragic flaw or error in judgment that leads to their downfall. This flaw can be a character trait such as pride, ambition, or jealousy, which ultimately causes the hero's undoing.
Brutus demonstrates a poor judgment of character primarily through his naivety in trusting Cassius and the conspirators without fully understanding their motivations. His idealism leads him to believe that their intentions are purely noble, overlooking the manipulative qualities of those around him. This miscalculation ultimately contributes to his downfall, as he fails to recognize the ambition and duplicity that drive the actions of others, particularly during the conspiracy against Caesar.
The term is "anagnorisis," which refers to the moment of tragic recognition or realization by the protagonist about their own character flaw or error in judgment.
poor operator judgment and lack of awareness.