answersLogoWhite

0

Shakespeare was not the only writer of plays in England at the time, you know. There were hundreds of them. And all of them drew people to the theatre. They went to see history plays and tragedies and romantic comedies and magical fantasies and political satire and clever stories about con artists. Most of these were not characterized by misery and unhappiness at the end. There were at least six operating theatres at any time in London, each capable of holding more than 1000 people six days a week. That is a lot of people attending the theatre. Why did they go? Because their alternatives were blood sports like bearbaiting which was not very intellectually stimulating and sermons in church, which were not very exciting. Theatre was the best entertainment going and it was great! Shakespeare was an extraordinary playwright, but that does not mean that everyone else writing at the time was not doing a great job.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Performing Arts

How were the social classes divided in the theatre in Shakespeare's time?

The social classes in the theatre were arranged so the richer, higher class people had the better veiw and more comfortable seats. As the theatres in shakespeares day were usually circular in shape this meant that the better seats were higher up. The poorer seats were in the open air space in the middle or the theatre with no seats unlike the richer classes above them.


Who and why did people go to the theater Victorian theater?

In Victorian England, the theater attracted a diverse audience, including the upper and middle classes, who sought entertainment and social engagement. The era's fascination with melodrama, spectacle, and morality plays drew people in, as performances often reflected contemporary social issues and provided a means of escapism. The theater also served as a venue for socializing, allowing patrons to see and be seen, reinforcing societal norms and class distinctions. Overall, Victorian theater was a vibrant cultural hub that catered to both the desire for entertainment and the exploration of moral and social themes.


What is the main element that makes theatre a social force?

Theater can be a strong force in social change. A good example of this is theater for development, in which theater is used to empower and influence communities by allowing people to express their ideas for social improvement in a creative format. Check out the related link to learn more about theater of development.


What type of people went to the globe theater in 1599?

In 1599, the Globe Theatre attracted a diverse audience, including both the wealthy and the lower classes. The gentry and nobility often sat in the more comfortable seats, while commoners, known as "groundlings," stood in the pit to watch performances at a lower cost. This blend of social classes created a unique atmosphere, where everyone shared the experience of live theater, regardless of their status. The plays performed often reflected the interests and issues of various social strata, making the theater a vibrant cultural hub of its time.


What did the Elizabethans come to the theater to be?

The Elizabethans came to the theater to be entertained, captivated by the dramatic storytelling, engaging characters, and the thrill of live performance. They sought a shared communal experience, enjoying the spectacle of the plays, which often explored themes of love, power, and human nature. Additionally, the theater served as a place for social interaction, where people from different classes could come together and immerse themselves in the rich cultural life of the time.

Related Questions

Did apache people have social classes?

No there were no social classes in the Apache tribe.


How were the social classes divided in the theatre in Shakespeare's time?

The social classes in the theatre were arranged so the richer, higher class people had the better veiw and more comfortable seats. As the theatres in shakespeares day were usually circular in shape this meant that the better seats were higher up. The poorer seats were in the open air space in the middle or the theatre with no seats unlike the richer classes above them.


How did properity lead to the developments of social classes?

Well, since prosperity is economic success and social classes are people who are alike...(social classes-a group of people who have similar backgrounds, income(money), and way of living) Prosperity lead to social classes by people learning more about each other and exploring. Thank you!!!!!!!!!! have fun in social studies....


Who and why did people go to the theater Victorian theater?

In Victorian England, the theater attracted a diverse audience, including the upper and middle classes, who sought entertainment and social engagement. The era's fascination with melodrama, spectacle, and morality plays drew people in, as performances often reflected contemporary social issues and provided a means of escapism. The theater also served as a venue for socializing, allowing patrons to see and be seen, reinforcing societal norms and class distinctions. Overall, Victorian theater was a vibrant cultural hub that catered to both the desire for entertainment and the exploration of moral and social themes.


Where was the social classes in anchien rome?

The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.


Social classes in Maryland in 1700's?

Social classes varied. Most of the people in the classes were made of negro slaves which made up one fourth of the Maryland colony.


What does the social pyramid show about Egypt's social classes?

There were many people advising the pharaoh


What is the social class in Southeast Asia?

The different type of people that have high classes or low classes. For example poor people or wealthy people.


What were the 3 social classes?

kings, priest,and,enslaved people


What social classes exist in ur?

UR held about 30,000 people,social classes included rulers and priests, trader's, craft workers, and artist's .


What is the main element that makes theatre a social force?

Theater can be a strong force in social change. A good example of this is theater for development, in which theater is used to empower and influence communities by allowing people to express their ideas for social improvement in a creative format. Check out the related link to learn more about theater of development.


What were the social groups of the aryan people who entered India?

When the Aryans first entered India, they were divided in three social classes, the warriors, the priests and the common people.