Neither. A kilogram is the same regardless.
Because of its' mass density. The lead would be much smaller in size.
Although they both weigh the same, the kg of feathers would be much more unwieldy, due to its volume. If the feathers were being carried in an open container, on a windy day, when you reached your destination, you would most likely have many less feathers than when you started!
For a start, kilogram is a unit of mass, not of weight.
Wow! If distance units and mass units could be converted, then you'd be able to calculate how much shorter your car would be on the moon due to the reduced force of gravity there. Not only that. When you fired off a round on the practice range, the farther the shot went, the more its mass would change. The mind boggles.
A chicken egg has approximately that mass. Note: A gram is a unit of mass; not a unit of weight.
They both have the same mass. A kilogram measure mass regardless of the material, volume etc.
Neither. They both have the same mass. "kg" is a measurement of mass. If you meant volume (the space taken up by the object), the feathers would have the greater volume.
A kilogram is a measure of mass therefore a kilogram of lead and a kilogram of feathers have the same mass: one kilogram. They would, however, have different volumes and densities.
Sand is denser than feathers. Since a given volume of a denser material has more mass than the same volume of a less dense material, when you make the masses the same, the volumes must vary.
-- The bricks and the feathers have the same weight.-- The bricks and the feathers have the same mass.-- The feathers have more volume than the bricks.-- The bricks have more density than the feathers.-- Neither the package of bricks nor the package of feathers is edible.-- The bricks definitely sink in water, whereas the feathers may float on water.-- When dropped through air, the feathers fall slower than the bricks, because of air resistance.-- I'm guessing that the feathers cost more than the bricks.
Their mass is 1 kg.
The answer is very much the same as the answer to the question: "Which weighs most, hot water, cold water, or water colored green ?" The answer, of course, is: That depends on how much you have of each substance. One thing we can definitely guarantee: A pound of bricks, a pound of cheese, and a pound of feathers all have precisely the same, identical, and indistinguishable weight.
No. The mass of one liter of feathers is not greater than the mass of 1 liter of nails. The mass of 1 liter of nails is greater than the mass of 1 liter of feathers. That's why 1 liter of nails is heavier than 1 liter of feathers.
The "kilogram" is a unit of mass. Every kilogram has the same mass, no matterof what substance.The question is much like asking: "Which is longer, a mile in a car or a mile on a bicycle ?"
Neither! They both have the same mass of 1 Kilogram.
Bricks have more density whereas feathers have less comparatively. Space occupied ie volume = mass/ density. So space occupied is inversely related to the density. Hence feathers occupy more space than the bricks.
yes and no. its like a pice of cardboard the size of a house and a brick the size of a house . same mass diff weight or it can go 1000lbs of feathers and 1000lbs of bricks. both weight the same but the mass of feathers will be alot more than the bricks _Newman