At first, the apothecary was not going to sell Romeo the poison because to do so was against the law and punishable by death. But Romeo convinced him by saying that he was so poor and starved that he should just sell it to him anyway. If he didn't sell him the poison, he probably would have died of starvation or disease. Romeo said that either way he might die, so he should sell him to poison to go buy some food.
long story short; Romeo uses money to convice him since the apothercaray was a very poor man
It's illegal to sell poisons in Mantua.
The apothecary says this when he sells Romeo poison.
Romeo thinks Juliet is dead Doesn't want to live without her The apothecary is poor, gets paid
Poison so he can poison himself and lay next to "dead" Juliet. The apothecary actually can't sell it by law, but he is seduced by the gold of Romeo. It's a very strong poison that "could dispatch someone with the strength of twenty men straight away."
Romeo actually says: "There is thy gold--worse poison to men's souls, doing more murder in this loathsome world than these poor compounds that thou mayst not sell." Romeo isn't selling the apothecary poison: he's giving him gold which is worse than poison. It's a pretty good line, actually.
It's illegal to sell poisons in Mantua.
The apothecary says this when he sells Romeo poison.
Romeo says, "There is thy gold, worse poison to men's souls, doing more murders in this loathsome world than these poor compounds that thou may'st not sell."
If the apothecary had refused to sell poison to Romeo, Romeo may have sought out another means to end his life, possibly resulting in a different turn of events for the tragic end of Romeo and Juliet. Alternatively, Romeo may have abandoned his plan altogether, leading to a potential alternative resolution for the story.
Romeo thinks Juliet is dead Doesn't want to live without her The apothecary is poor, gets paid
Poison so he can poison himself and lay next to "dead" Juliet. The apothecary actually can't sell it by law, but he is seduced by the gold of Romeo. It's a very strong poison that "could dispatch someone with the strength of twenty men straight away."
The pharmacist would not have given him the poison he wanted if Romeo had not paid him. The druggist was so desperate for money that he would break the law and sell poison, but he would never have given it to Romeo or anyone without being well-paid.
Romeo actually says: "There is thy gold--worse poison to men's souls, doing more murder in this loathsome world than these poor compounds that thou mayst not sell." Romeo isn't selling the apothecary poison: he's giving him gold which is worse than poison. It's a pretty good line, actually.
It's illegal to sell poisons and the apothecary is doubtful about breaking the law.
The person who sold the poison to Romeo was "The Apothecary."
"My poverty but not my will consents." He does it because he is in desperate need of the money.
Because the apothecary said that he would sell the poison to Romeo only because he needed the money so badly (selling poison is illegal in Mantua). Therefore, the apothecary's poverty (state/situation) is forcing him to take Romeo's offer, not because he wants to disobey the law. Romeo is paying the apothecary's need, not his want.