If the most powerful person in your country with the ability to have you imprisoned or executed was the granddaughter of Richard IIIs greatest enemy you would not portray him as a good man. Queen Elizabeths grandfather was Henry Tudor, later Henry VII, the leader of the Lancastrians.
Richard III
Because Richard III fought a battle with Elizabeth's grandfather, Henry Tudor, in which Richard was killed (the Battle of Bosworth) and Henry took the crown as Henry VII. Richard was supposed to have been responsible for murdering the boy King Edward V and his little brother - the so-called Princes In The Tower. (Young Edward and his brother were the brothers of Elizabeth of York, Henry VII's wife). Therefore the Tudors hated Richard III and would be pleased with any propaganda against him. Shakespeare's play Richard III, helped to give Richard a bad name!
The idea of the wheel of fortune was touched upon in Shakespeare's 'Richard III'. He says So now prosperity begins to mellow And drop into the rotten mouth of death at the start of Act IV Scene iv. This neatly embodies the wheel of fortune idea.
hi Richard 111 locked up his nephew's so he could become king then he killed them
In Act 3 Scene 1 of Richard III, Richard says " So wise so young, they say, do never live long." as an aside after a remark by his nephew Prince Edward. His meaning is that when people that young are that clever, they can expect to die soon. Although Edward's death did not in the least depend on his cleverness.
Richard's badge was of a boar, so he is compared to this animal.
Richard III
Because Richard III fought a battle with Elizabeth's grandfather, Henry Tudor, in which Richard was killed (the Battle of Bosworth) and Henry took the crown as Henry VII. Richard was supposed to have been responsible for murdering the boy King Edward V and his little brother - the so-called Princes In The Tower. (Young Edward and his brother were the brothers of Elizabeth of York, Henry VII's wife). Therefore the Tudors hated Richard III and would be pleased with any propaganda against him. Shakespeare's play Richard III, helped to give Richard a bad name!
He was a good king however the mis-reports and Shakespeare's story are wrong so in fact he was a nice king.
Shakespeare's Richard III is a play which does deal in a rough way with the reign of the English king. However, some of the events depicted may not have happened at all, and others are doubtful. And as is usual with plays based on historic events, the events have been collapsed so the events of years look like they took place at the same time. The play should not be considered a reliable biography of Richard III.
Of course we do not know exactly when any of Shakespeare's plays were written. The Signet series puts Richard III very early, in 1592 or 1593. Others would place it later, around the time of the composition of Romeo and Juliet and A Midsummer Night's Dream in 1595 or so. It was certainly written before 1597 when it was first published, and if the title page is to be believed, it was in the repertory of the Lord Chamberlain's Men shortly before.
Shakespeare had already made a contribution to the popular History genre with his three Henry VI plays. (Possibly he may have written Edward III as well, but we'll leave that up for debate) In the last Henry VI play he created the character of Gloster, the man who will become Richard III. It was a reasonable progression to carry on and tell Richard's story, since the Gloster character was so vibrant.
The idea of the wheel of fortune was touched upon in Shakespeare's 'Richard III'. He says So now prosperity begins to mellow And drop into the rotten mouth of death at the start of Act IV Scene iv. This neatly embodies the wheel of fortune idea.
There is no such thing as true evil in real people, although Shakespeare's portrayal of him would certainly have people thinking that. Richard III had been brought up in a society where family members killed family members and all the Plantagenets had to be on their guard. His older brother Edward had arranged for their other brother the Duke of Clarence to be killed so Richard III was not the first in his generation of brothers to arrange for another family member's murder. It is true that Richard III got swept away with ambition and that was his major downfall. But prior to his brother's death Richard was well liked particularly in the north of England and a popular soldier.
It depends what you imagine "Shakespeare's interest" to be. There is no external evidence that he had any interests of any kind apart from making money and social climbing. So, maybe Timon of Athens (which is about losing money, not making it) and Richard III (who is sort of a social climber).
My brother is so devious he does not know what salvage mean.
No, but he lost his last battle, so the only people to write about him were trying to suck-up to the descendants of his victors. Shakespeare wrote of him as a monster because his monarch, Queen Elizabeth 1, was a granddaughter of Richards' enemy.