0
Such a thing does exist. The problem here is the distinction between validity and truth. Validity refers to the soundness of the process of argument, Truth to the arguments affinity with real life states of affairs. It's easiest to understand with a demonstration.
In the syllogism, or argument;
Steve is a Dog.
All Dogs have Brown fur.
Therefore, Steve has brown fur.
The argument is formally sound, as indicated below;
A is B
All B are C
Therefore, A is C
So the Steve argument is valid, even though its second premise (the minor premise) isn't true. Validity isn't about the content of the argument, its about the actual form the argument takes.
What else can I help you with?
Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?
No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.
When the premise of a deductive argument follow the correct form we call the argument?
Valid. A deductive argument is considered valid when it follows the correct form of logic, even if the premises are not true. This means that if the premises of a valid deductive argument are true, then the conclusion must also be true.
What type of argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion or from a general premise to a general conclusion?
Valid ArgumentThanks to the above answerer, I got this question wrong on my quiz.The correct answer is Valid argument.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.
What will the The truth table for a valid deductive argument show?
The truth table for a valid deductive argument will show that when the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. It will demonstrate that the argument follows the rules of deductive logic and the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?
No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.
What is the difference between a valid deductive argument and a fallacy?
A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.
When the premise of a deductive argument follow the correct form we call the argument?
Valid. A deductive argument is considered valid when it follows the correct form of logic, even if the premises are not true. This means that if the premises of a valid deductive argument are true, then the conclusion must also be true.
What type of argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion or from a general premise to a general conclusion?
Valid ArgumentThanks to the above answerer, I got this question wrong on my quiz.The correct answer is Valid argument.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.
What will the The truth table for a valid deductive argument show?
The truth table for a valid deductive argument will show that when the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. It will demonstrate that the argument follows the rules of deductive logic and the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
His argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion or from a general premise to a general conclusion?
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
What makes a valid deductive argument?
A valid deductive argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. The form of the argument must be such that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.
Can a sound argument have a false conclusion?
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
Is a suppressed premise valid?
A suppressed premise is not explicitly stated in an argument but is assumed to be understood by the audience. While it can be valid if it logically supports the conclusion, the overall validity of the argument depends on the strength and relevance of that implied premise. If the suppressed premise is questionable or false, it can undermine the argument's validity. Thus, clarity and transparency in presenting all premises are crucial for robust reasoning.
What makes a valid argument invalid?
A valid argument becomes invalid when it contains a logical fallacy, such as a false premise or faulty reasoning. Additionally, if the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premises provided, the argument is considered invalid.
What is An argument that starts from a general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?
A deductive argument starts from a general principle or premise and uses it to logically conclude a more specific statement. This type of argument moves from the general to the specific, showing how the premise leads to a certain conclusion through valid reasoning.
