The Socratic method is a form of questioning and dialogue developed by the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates. It involves asking probing questions to stimulate critical thinking and uncover underlying assumptions. The Socratic method is focused on exploring ideas and seeking truth through discussion and debate.
In contrast, the scientific method is a systematic approach to investigating the natural world through observation, experimentation, and analysis. It involves formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and drawing conclusions based on empirical evidence.
The key difference between the two methods is that the Socratic method is more focused on philosophical inquiry and dialogue, while the scientific method is more focused on empirical investigation and testing of hypotheses.
A brute fact is a fact that exists without any explanation or deeper reason behind it. For example, the fact that the sky is blue is a brute fact because it is simply the way things are without a further explanation. This differs from other types of facts, such as scientific facts, which are based on evidence and reasoning to explain why things are the way they are.
The five steps of the Socratic method are: (1) Clarify the question being asked, (2) Provide a definition of key terms, (3) Explain the question, (4) Construct an argument, and (5) Synthesize the discussion into a conclusion.
Explicate, elaborate, make clear, describe, define, resolve, clarify, simplify
Pre-Socratic philosophers were primarily concerned with understanding the fundamental nature of the universe and the underlying principles governing it. They sought to explain the world in terms of natural phenomena, such as the elements or abstract concepts like numbers and change. Their inquiries laid the foundation for Western philosophy and science.
An example of posteriori knowledge is knowing that water boils at 100 degrees Celsius through observation and experience. This differs from a priori knowledge, which is knowledge that can be known independently of experience, such as knowing that all bachelors are unmarried.
False
A scientific term used to describe a testable model that seeks to explain natural phenomena is a scientific theory. It is formulated based on observations, experiments, and evidence to provide a thorough explanation of a particular phenomenon in nature.
No, scientific laws describe what happens under certain conditions, based on repeated observations and experiments. They do not explain why things happen, but provide a framework for understanding and predicting natural phenomena.
Describe is what it is and explain is why it is as it is
Describe is what it is and explain is why it is as it is
Scientific laws describe regular patterns or relationships in nature, but they do not explain why these patterns occur. Laws are empirical generalizations based on repeated observations and experiments. Theories are what provide the explanatory framework for why these patterns or relationships exist.
describe and explain child's right?
Explain how a research becomes a scientific knowledge
Yes, a scientific law describes a pattern or relationship that has been observed repeatedly in the natural world. It summarizes a consistent phenomenon that can be used to make predictions and explain how things work.
A brute fact is a fact that exists without any explanation or deeper reason behind it. For example, the fact that the sky is blue is a brute fact because it is simply the way things are without a further explanation. This differs from other types of facts, such as scientific facts, which are based on evidence and reasoning to explain why things are the way they are.
a food web is when you have different varieties and it differs because a food chain is only a line
The five steps of the Socratic method are: (1) Clarify the question being asked, (2) Provide a definition of key terms, (3) Explain the question, (4) Construct an argument, and (5) Synthesize the discussion into a conclusion.