Contradictory premises are statements that cannot both be true at the same time. For example, "All cats are mammals" and "No mammals have fur" are contradictory premises because they cannot both be true simultaneously.
Contradictory premises refer to two statements that cannot both be true at the same time. For example, "All dogs are mammals" and "No dogs are mammals" are contradictory premises. Another example is "It is raining outside" and "It is not raining outside."
False premises in arguments are statements that are not true or accurate, but are used as the basis for an argument. Examples include: "All politicians are corrupt," "If you don't support this policy, you must be unpatriotic," and "If you're not with us, you're against us." These false premises can lead to flawed reasoning and invalid conclusions.
An example of a logical fallacy that involves contradictory premises is the "fallacy of the excluded middle." This fallacy occurs when someone presents only two options as if they are the only possibilities, when in fact there are other options available. For example, saying "Either you're with us or you're against us" is a fallacy of the excluded middle because it ignores the possibility of being neutral or having a different perspective.
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. An argument is strong if the premises provide good support for the conclusion, making it likely to be true.
Contradictory questions are those that cannot both be true at the same time. For example, "Is the sky blue?" and "Is the sky not blue?" are contradictory questions because the sky cannot be both blue and not blue simultaneously.
Contradictory premises refer to two statements that cannot both be true at the same time. For example, "All dogs are mammals" and "No dogs are mammals" are contradictory premises. Another example is "It is raining outside" and "It is not raining outside."
mn
False premises in arguments are statements that are not true or accurate, but are used as the basis for an argument. Examples include: "All politicians are corrupt," "If you don't support this policy, you must be unpatriotic," and "If you're not with us, you're against us." These false premises can lead to flawed reasoning and invalid conclusions.
An example of a logical fallacy that involves contradictory premises is the "fallacy of the excluded middle." This fallacy occurs when someone presents only two options as if they are the only possibilities, when in fact there are other options available. For example, saying "Either you're with us or you're against us" is a fallacy of the excluded middle because it ignores the possibility of being neutral or having a different perspective.
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. An argument is strong if the premises provide good support for the conclusion, making it likely to be true.
Verbal irony is when a character says something directly contradictory. There are many examples in Fahrenheit 451.
Click on the links to the right for examples.
Contradictory questions are those that cannot both be true at the same time. For example, "Is the sky blue?" and "Is the sky not blue?" are contradictory questions because the sky cannot be both blue and not blue simultaneously.
Contradictory Premises. Conclusions are drawn from the interactions of premises: where two premises contradict each other, there can be no interaction and hence no conclusion. Similarly, if the definitions of two terms conflict with or exclude each other, then those two terms cannot be simultaneously ascribed to a single object or event. The classic example of contradictory premises is the question, "What will happen if an irresistible force meets an immovable object?" The problem here is that in a universe where an irresistible force has been defined to exist, there cannot also exist an immovable object, because then the force would not be irresistible. Conversely, if there is discovered or defined such an item as an immovable object, then by definition there can be no such thing as an irresistible force.This fallacy's most popular appearance is in the form of a challenging question, because questions with contradictory premises are such brain teasers. In each case, though, no answer can be given because the premises cannot both be true.Into what shape of hole would a round square fit?If an object is all black and all white at the same time, what color is it?If an object is both stationary and traveling at an infinite rate of speed, how long will it take to meet itself?If God can do anything, can he make a stone so heavy that he cannot lift it?If God is all powerful, can he put himself out of existence and come back with twice the power he had before?
Some examples of start up costs include: Installing equipment Acquiring premises Renovating Premises Initial stock License agreements
Self-contradictory statements are called paradoxes. They are seemingly true, but lead to a logical inconsistency or contradiction when examined closely. Some famous examples include "This statement is false" and "I always lie."
This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.