Mathematics does not directly prove the existence of God. The relationship between math and the concept of God is a matter of personal belief and interpretation, rather than a scientific or mathematical proof.
Agnosticism is the belief that the existence of God or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable. It is a philosophical stance that asserts that there is not enough evidence to prove or disprove the existence of a higher power.
The ontological argument is a deductive argument. It aims to prove the existence of God based on the concept of God as a necessary being. It uses logical reasoning to demonstrate that the existence of God is a necessary consequence of the definition of God as a perfect being.
One of St. Thomas Aquinas's famous questions was "Whether God Exists" in his work Summa Theologica. Aquinas sought to prove the existence of God through reasoning and philosophical arguments.
The existence of a god does not necessarily mean that they seek forgiveness from you.
what else will you do with this free gift of life? God exists- you would not be here asking this question if this were not so. It is not impossible to come to know God-70% of the world have done so.
There is no proof of God existing, though there is also no proof that he doesn't. It's all a matter of belief, until we can prove or disprove God's existence.
Rene Descartes philosophy of logic and rationality led him to come to the conclusion that God must exist. Without his existence, there is not explanation for the universe.
Science doesn’t have the processes to prove or disprove the existence of God. Science studies and attempts to explain only the natural world while God, in most religions, is supernatural.
Answer:In the scientific sense no argument for the existence of a god or other deity has ever been made. Most of the proofs are fallacious arguments not proof.In the area of proof the burden is for the believer to prove its existence not for the disbeliever to disprove it. In the simple case of math, it is only necessary for a person to prove 2+2=4, not for the disbeliever to prove that every other answer is wrong.Carl Sagan examined this problem in his discussion of the Dragon in his neighbours garage. (See Link) No matter how he tried to prove it was non existent, the neighbour kept coming up with definitions and exceptions to disprove the position.
Only if you can disprove/prove the existence of God.
Why so much strain in knowing the existence of God when God Himself revealing His existence? I am a living evidence for the existence of God. If you know me, you will understand. I am surrounded by lot of negative forces (spirits). I am scolding them daily. I think most of the people or almost all people are hearing my voices as well as evil spirits’ voices everyday. At present all creatures including human beings are living in a miraculous era of God. This is a temporary miracle of God. I am connected to all creatures including human beings and spirits internally by God since year 1950 but I am not a God. I think that all human beings can see what I see, can hear what I hear and even know my thoughts. But thoughts are complicated matter. It needs an explanation. The people who have born in this era cannot realize this miracle because they have born with it. An old brave and honest gentleman aged 85 can explain about this miracle.
God
Agnosticism is the belief that the existence of God or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable. It is a philosophical stance that asserts that there is not enough evidence to prove or disprove the existence of a higher power.
Most philosophers would say that it is impossible to disprove the existence of god(s), because it is usually not possible absolutely to prove a negative. It can only be proventhat God is highly improbable. As in all arguments about existence or non-existence, the responsibility to provide the proof falls on those who claim that God does exist. In almost two thousand years of Christian argument fo the existence of God, that proof has not been forthcoming.
The only valid proof of the existence of ghosts or of gods or of anything at all is the proof by example. Someone must produce a ghost or a god or a heffalump which is verified by the senses (non-distorting aids like telescopes, microscopes, and amplifiers are OK, transformative aids like Photoshop are not) of experts judged to be credible both by believers in the idea in question and by nonbelievers. Until a ghost or a god is produced for public evaluation their existence may be considered doubtful but unproven.
here be me thomas aquinas own argument to say that god is real i can prove bye the holy spirit
There is no "the" agnostic. An agnostic is a person whom does not see enough evidence to prove or disprove God's existence, and they don't really dwell on it.