0 + 0 = 0. You need something to cause something else; you'll get a number once a positive one is added to the equation. Jehovah God is the first cause, responsible for all in existence now. (Revelation 4:11; Genesis 1:1) Mathematics found in nature (such as the Golden Angle) are proof of intelligent design, and the scriptures state that He's the ultimate designer. (Hebrews 3:4) He's the source of life itself (Psalm 36:9) and is unable to die, which explains how He's been around for an eternity.
(New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures)
Agnosticism is the belief that the existence of God or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable. It is a philosophical stance that asserts that there is not enough evidence to prove or disprove the existence of a higher power.
The ontological argument is a deductive argument. It aims to prove the existence of God based on the concept of God as a necessary being. It uses logical reasoning to demonstrate that the existence of God is a necessary consequence of the definition of God as a perfect being.
One of St. Thomas Aquinas's famous questions was "Whether God Exists" in his work Summa Theologica. Aquinas sought to prove the existence of God through reasoning and philosophical arguments.
The existence of a god does not necessarily mean that they seek forgiveness from you.
The existence of a god does not depend on their need to seek forgiveness from you.
Rene Descartes philosophy of logic and rationality led him to come to the conclusion that God must exist. Without his existence, there is not explanation for the universe.
Science doesn’t have the processes to prove or disprove the existence of God. Science studies and attempts to explain only the natural world while God, in most religions, is supernatural.
Only if you can disprove/prove the existence of God.
God
Agnosticism is the belief that the existence of God or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable. It is a philosophical stance that asserts that there is not enough evidence to prove or disprove the existence of a higher power.
Most philosophers would say that it is impossible to disprove the existence of god(s), because it is usually not possible absolutely to prove a negative. It can only be proventhat God is highly improbable. As in all arguments about existence or non-existence, the responsibility to provide the proof falls on those who claim that God does exist. In almost two thousand years of Christian argument fo the existence of God, that proof has not been forthcoming.
The only valid proof of the existence of ghosts or of gods or of anything at all is the proof by example. Someone must produce a ghost or a god or a heffalump which is verified by the senses (non-distorting aids like telescopes, microscopes, and amplifiers are OK, transformative aids like Photoshop are not) of experts judged to be credible both by believers in the idea in question and by nonbelievers. Until a ghost or a god is produced for public evaluation their existence may be considered doubtful but unproven.
here be me thomas aquinas own argument to say that god is real i can prove bye the holy spirit
There is no "the" agnostic. An agnostic is a person whom does not see enough evidence to prove or disprove God's existence, and they don't really dwell on it.
The ontological argument is a deductive argument. It aims to prove the existence of God based on the concept of God as a necessary being. It uses logical reasoning to demonstrate that the existence of God is a necessary consequence of the definition of God as a perfect being.
According to the bible jesus is not a God. and he is a messenger of god appointed to the community he was. So there is no need for him to prove his existence for all for more details visit http://groups.google.com/group/the-ultimate-truth-of-life?hl=en
the existence of released energy