I beleive that renaissance shcolars differed from medieval scholars because of simply the time era, medieval time was after the crusades, in which catholics destroyed vast amounts of book not containg direct beleif to god, which burned the knowledge of those peoples next few gerations. but im new to this and thats off the top of my noggin seems logical.
Renaissance thinkers emphasized humanism, individualism, and the importance of secular knowledge and classical learning. In contrast, medieval scholars focused on theology, Scholasticism, and faith-based understanding of the world. Renaissance thinkers sought to explore and understand the natural world through observation and reason, while medieval scholars relied more heavily on faith and religious teachings.
Ideas became more accepted around Southern Europe, people began to ask more questions and had an overwhelming thirst for knowledge . During those times the people such as Leonardo Da' Vinci (or those known as renaissance men) focused on the here and now rather then other world orders . They believed do what you want now and pay later in other words! Humanism is the belief that a group of educated people can change the world, renaissance was a new beginning for this . The word renaissance even means that . Hope that was detailed enough
It might. "Renaissance" (litterally: 'Rebirth') was about the renewed study and appreciation of classical art and science. That might theoretically speaking also have occurred through scholars and artists living in small towns or in the country. But art and science at the time were mostly practised under the protection and support of local rulers who lived in the cities. So it follows that most scientists and artists who brought about the Renaissance had to live in those cities as well.
The Elizabethan age reflected the values of the Italian Renaissance through an embrace of humanism, a focus on the arts, literature, and theater, and an interest in classical learning and culture. This period saw a flourishing of intellectual and artistic achievements similar to those seen in Italy during the Renaissance.
Yes, during the Renaissance, individuals who excelled in various fields such as art, literature, science, and philosophy were highly admired and respected. These individuals were often referred to as "Renaissance men" for their well-rounded knowledge and abilities. Leonardo da Vinci is a notable example of a Renaissance man who made significant contributions to multiple disciplines.
Renaissance scholars focused on humanism, individualism, and a revival of classical learning and culture, while medieval scholars were more centered on theology, scholasticism, and religious teachings. Renaissance scholars were more interested in the arts, literature, and science, while medieval scholars focused on deciphering and interpreting religious texts and doctrines.
Renaissance thinkers emphasized humanism, individualism, and the importance of secular knowledge and classical learning. In contrast, medieval scholars focused on theology, Scholasticism, and faith-based understanding of the world. Renaissance thinkers sought to explore and understand the natural world through observation and reason, while medieval scholars relied more heavily on faith and religious teachings.
The Medieval world tended to be Theocentric. The Renaissance world tended to be Anthropocentric.
His paintings showed emotional intensity and his figures seemed to have volume.
His paintings showed emotional intensity and his figures seemed to have volume.
There were more established musical instruments by then. There were beginning to be a lot of good performers on those instruments. Composers were broadening their experimentation with music to include two and three part harmonies, instead of just individual polyphonic lines. Those are the three main reasons - there are lots of others. But your question is well put. Renaissance music did indeed sound "fuller" than medieval music.
It wasn't originally called 'Gothic'. It was called 'French style' architecture by those who built the structures in the Middle Ages. The term was first applied during the Renaissance by artists and builders who referred to medieval structures as 'Gothic' - a put down meaning Germanic, barbarian, non-Classical. The Renaissance, of course, was much more concerned with Classical Greek and Roman art than with medieval European.
Those widows who remarried in the time of The Renaissance, were criticized for being disloyal to their husbands.
Washington DC experienced a renaissance when those areas damaged in the riots were gentrified.
Ideas became more accepted around Southern Europe, people began to ask more questions and had an overwhelming thirst for knowledge . During those times the people such as Leonardo Da' Vinci (or those known as renaissance men) focused on the here and now rather then other world orders . They believed do what you want now and pay later in other words! Humanism is the belief that a group of educated people can change the world, renaissance was a new beginning for this . The word renaissance even means that . Hope that was detailed enough
Probably. I've seen people wear a huge variety of different costumes to those kinds of things. .............................. It is fine to wear but since renaissance faire is closely related to renn or medieval times so you should dress accordingly. For the reference you can google some the websites and outfits which are available online also.
The arteries of the pulmonary circulation differ from those of the systemic circulation in that they carry?