0
How did socrates' view of the good truth and the just disagree with that of the sophists?
Socrates believed in absolute truth and objective morality, seeing them as universal and unchanging concepts. In contrast, the Sophists believed that truth and morality were subjective and relative to individuals or societies, leading to the belief that these concepts could be manipulated or changed to suit personal gain or persuasion. Socrates argued for the pursuit of knowledge and virtue as essential to understanding the good and the just, while the Sophists emphasized persuasion and the ability to argue different viewpoints regardless of their truthfulness.
What else can I help you with?
How did Socrates' view of the good true and just disagree with that of the Sophists?
Socrates believed that absolute standards of the good, true, and just exist objectively and can be known through reason, while the Sophists believed that these concepts are relative and subject to individual interpretation. Socrates argued that there are universal truths that are not mere products of opinion or persuasion, unlike the Sophists who emphasized rhetoric and persuasion to sway opinions rather than seeking objective truth.
How did Socrates view of the good true and justice disagree with that of the Sophists?
Socrates believed that the good, true, and justice were objective values that existed independently of individual opinions, and could be discovered through rational inquiry and dialogue. In contrast, the Sophists believed that these values were subjective and could vary from person to person, and they often used rhetoric and persuasion to argue their point of view, rather than seeking ultimate truth.
How did Socrates view of the good true and just disagree with that of the sophists?
The meaning of these things was not relative
Socrates notion of wisdom in response to the sophist?
Not 100% sure here, but I think the goal of Socrates was to learn the truth whatever it may be, good or bad, while Sophistry was the art of winning an argument for a "truth" which was already in acceptance.
Why was Socrates looking for truth?
Socrates was searching for truth because he believed that it was essential for living a good and virtuous life. He felt that by uncovering the truth about oneself and the world, one could achieve wisdom and ultimately lead a more fulfilling existence.
How did Socrates' view of the good true and just disagree with that of the Sophists?
Socrates believed that absolute standards of the good, true, and just exist objectively and can be known through reason, while the Sophists believed that these concepts are relative and subject to individual interpretation. Socrates argued that there are universal truths that are not mere products of opinion or persuasion, unlike the Sophists who emphasized rhetoric and persuasion to sway opinions rather than seeking objective truth.
How did Socrates view of the good true and justice disagree with that of the Sophists?
Socrates believed that the good, true, and justice were objective values that existed independently of individual opinions, and could be discovered through rational inquiry and dialogue. In contrast, the Sophists believed that these values were subjective and could vary from person to person, and they often used rhetoric and persuasion to argue their point of view, rather than seeking ultimate truth.
How did Socrates view of the good true and just disagree with that of the sophists?
The meaning of these things was not relative
Socrates notion of wisdom in response to the sophist?
Not 100% sure here, but I think the goal of Socrates was to learn the truth whatever it may be, good or bad, while Sophistry was the art of winning an argument for a "truth" which was already in acceptance.
Why was Socrates looking for truth?
Socrates was searching for truth because he believed that it was essential for living a good and virtuous life. He felt that by uncovering the truth about oneself and the world, one could achieve wisdom and ultimately lead a more fulfilling existence.
What is Socrates definition of virtue?
Socrates defined virtue as the state of wisdom by which an individual knows what is right and acts accordingly. He believed that true virtue is knowledge and that people do what they believe to be good, even if they are mistaken.
What did Socrates mean when he used the three sieves to determine the truth in conversations?
Socrates used the three sieves to determine the truth in conversations by asking if the information was true, good, and useful. If the information did not pass through all three sieves, he considered it not worth discussing.
Is Socrates against relativism?
Yes, Socrates is against relativism. He believed in objective truth and that knowledge and virtue are universal concepts that exist independently of individual perspectives or beliefs. Socrates argued that objective standards should be applied to ethics and morality, rather than subjective opinions.
Is the this an arguable and good thesis Socrates proves that knowledge and truth can be obtained for anyone in the meno and republic?
This question requires extra information to enable me answer it correctly.
Did Socrates live a good life or bad life?
Socrates is often regarded as having lived a good life. He was a philosopher who sought wisdom and truth, practiced virtue, and encouraged others to question their beliefs. Despite facing challenges and ultimately being sentenced to death, he remained steadfast in his commitment to his principles.
Would Socrates Plato Aristotle and Aquinas concur that all moral and political truth is relative to ones time and place?
No. Since Socrates did not write any books, even though he thought that nothing is more important than living a good life it is difficult to know just what he thought about the relativity of value judgments about moral and political questions. Aristotle would be at least somewhat sympathetic to the idea that moral and political truth is relative, but he would insist, as would Plato, that what most counts is the moral character of the person making the claim (rather than the claim abstracted from an actual situation). In other words, for them, a value judgment is true if a good person thinks it is true. Aquinas would disagree that moral and political truth is relative; since, for him (unlike for the other three) God is responsible for creating truth, truth is absolute although, of course, it is sometimes difficult for human beings to apprehend it. .
Why do you think many Greeks condemned the ideas of the sophsis?
Many Greeks condemned the ideas of the sophists because they viewed them as undermining traditional values and beliefs, particularly in relation to ethics and morality. Sophists emphasized relativism and the idea that truth could be shaped by rhetoric and context, which clashed with the more absolute moral frameworks upheld by philosophers like Socrates and Plato. This led to concerns that sophistry promoted deceit and manipulation over genuine knowledge and virtue, ultimately threatening the social cohesion of Greek society. Additionally, their focus on personal success and persuasion was seen as prioritizing individual gain over the common good.
