Okay, well, my viewpoint is:
the reason why one could argue that Socrates was a "common" sophist (being payed for knowledge) is, because he also got payed for his knowledge, more often with (personal) favours than with monay, but he was payed. so far the conventional Sophist.
deeper:
sophist as in altering his knowledge as to suit what people expect, or being payed for.
well, when conquering people with questions that lead to further questions, it is inevitable to keep on questioning and not agreeing on something eventually. so here it is probable that he contradicted his own viewpoint just to prove that another person did not have an answer to this question.
secondly, in "Apology" (thats how the text was called that we had in our lecture) he says he will not bring his family into the courtroom, but he mentioned it and that alone already contradicts his "not using his family to gain extra points".
that, for now, is the only (possible) explenation i could give :)
Greetings
Plato believes that Socrates was mistaken for a Sophist because of his thought-provoking questioning style and his focus on challenging conventional beliefs. However, Socrates differed from the Sophists in that he did not accept payment for his teachings and sought after truth rather than personal gain. Plato aimed to distinguish Socrates from the Sophists by portraying him as a philosopher who pursued wisdom and virtue, rather than being motivated by debate or rhetoric.
Sophist's desired money in return for teaching young men various things about political and social life, such as rhetoric. The word Sophist means something along the lines of "One who is wise" Socrates was a philosopher, meaning "Lover of wisdom" He spent his days wandering around the gym and the agora (market), talking to people. He developed a following of young Greeks, such as Plato and Xenephon. Socrates did not charge for his teachings. He also made a habit of proving just how little Sophist's actually knew.
The play "Clouds" that made fun of the philosopher Socrates was written by the ancient Greek playwright Aristophanes. In the play, Socrates is portrayed as a sophist who teaches absurd theories to his students, mocking his unconventional philosophical ideas.
No. He did not. Protagoras was the first Sophist and believed in skeptism, but unlike Socrates believed in the validty of only relative truth. Any truth needed a believer. Objective truth did not exist. Man is the measure of all things, and anyone presenting an absolute truth or objective truth is to be doubted.
Not 100% sure here, but I think the goal of Socrates was to learn the truth whatever it may be, good or bad, while Sophistry was the art of winning an argument for a "truth" which was already in acceptance.
Socrates would roll over in his grave if he could see this question. Socrates, his pupil Plato and later Aristotle all opposed the Sophist philosophy. Although most written examples of the sophists come from either Plato or Aristotle, it was largely reported that the Sophists used the art of Rhetoric to pursuade people on issues of truth and morality. Socrates felt that because the goal of Rhetoric was to pursuade rather than seek truth, he criticized the sophist philosophy. I should know. I am a sophist. Michael U.C. Berkeley, class of '93 Rhetoric Major
Socrates did not believe in the singular God of Judaism, Christianity, or Islam.
Plato believes that Socrates was mistaken for a Sophist because of his thought-provoking questioning style and his focus on challenging conventional beliefs. However, Socrates differed from the Sophists in that he did not accept payment for his teachings and sought after truth rather than personal gain. Plato aimed to distinguish Socrates from the Sophists by portraying him as a philosopher who pursued wisdom and virtue, rather than being motivated by debate or rhetoric.
Socrates was an opponent of the Sophists. He believed that the Sophists only taught opinions instead of teaching students to find the truth for themselves.
They weren't. The Sophists were condemned by Socrates, according to Plato. Aristophanes, on the other hand, claims that Socrates was himself a Sophist no different from any other one.
Sophist's desired money in return for teaching young men various things about political and social life, such as rhetoric. The word Sophist means something along the lines of "One who is wise" Socrates was a philosopher, meaning "Lover of wisdom" He spent his days wandering around the gym and the agora (market), talking to people. He developed a following of young Greeks, such as Plato and Xenephon. Socrates did not charge for his teachings. He also made a habit of proving just how little Sophist's actually knew.
The play "Clouds" that made fun of the philosopher Socrates was written by the ancient Greek playwright Aristophanes. In the play, Socrates is portrayed as a sophist who teaches absurd theories to his students, mocking his unconventional philosophical ideas.
Sophist were the teachers who basically taught philosophy. This is a sentence using the word sophist.
when was sophist born and wherewhy was sophist important
Asterius the Sophist died in 341.
Thales of Miletus is usually regarded as the first "philosopher". More particularly, he is the first of the Greek "Pre-socratic" philosophers (philosophers before Socrates). Thales and the other presocratics are sometimes called "sophists", and Socrates was a sort of anti-sophist who used a method of interrogation ("the elenchus") to reveal the ignorance and confusion behind the sophist's claims to knowledge. Against the sophists, who claimed to be wise, Socrates and his followers called themselves "philosophers", that is, "lovers of wisdom", to show that they were still trying to figure out the answers, and did not yet claim to have the final answers to everything.
No. He did not. Protagoras was the first Sophist and believed in skeptism, but unlike Socrates believed in the validty of only relative truth. Any truth needed a believer. Objective truth did not exist. Man is the measure of all things, and anyone presenting an absolute truth or objective truth is to be doubted.