Carnegie's attitude towards the poor can be characterized as a mixture of philanthropy and social Darwinism. He believed in giving back to society through initiatives like public libraries and universities, but also held the belief that individuals had to improve themselves through hard work and self-reliance.
Rizal was initially cautious and critical of armed revolutions, believing in reforms through peaceful means. He emphasized the importance of education and enlightenment to effect change. However, he eventually expressed support for the 1896 Revolution and recognized its significance in achieving independence from Spain.
It is not clear from your question whose attitude you are asking about, although the inference is that it is a god. Could be Zeus, who knows. The attitude of Zeus toward humans would have to be described as paternalistic. His attitude toward other gods would be described as competitive.
Some northern workers during the abolition era held negative attitudes towards abolition because they feared increased competition for jobs from freed slaves. They believed that the abolition of slavery would threaten their livelihoods and economic stability.
Wordsworth valued his past as a source of inspiration and wisdom, often reflecting on his childhood experiences in nature. He found solace and connection to the present moment in nature and its beauty. Regarding the future, Wordsworth believed in the power of imagination and the potential for personal growth and enlightenment.
She had a fatalistic attitude, believing that whatever was meant to happen would happen regardless of her actions.
Rizal was initially cautious and critical of armed revolutions, believing in reforms through peaceful means. He emphasized the importance of education and enlightenment to effect change. However, he eventually expressed support for the 1896 Revolution and recognized its significance in achieving independence from Spain.
You have an attitude that will not make others like you.
your attitude and how you act towards people would be examples of qualities :)
You must mention the title you are interested in...
No, i would rather not. It haunts me
the Germans would have killed all the handicapped people along with children and the elderly
Lincoln would use military force only when necessary.
Their attitude should reflect their values. If they are genuine and honest, their actions would promote their trustworthiness. If they are hateful and deceitful, their actions would be gossiping perhaps or talking nasty about another and the like.
It is not clear from your question whose attitude you are asking about, although the inference is that it is a god. Could be Zeus, who knows. The attitude of Zeus toward humans would have to be described as paternalistic. His attitude toward other gods would be described as competitive.
Since a Utopian is one who seeks an ideal world, he would be a passivist and oppose all war.
he thought that the people were his property, and that he would get more money with taxing more people.
Lincoln would use military force only when necessary.