Yes, it is true that the statement "640k ought to be enough for anybody" was famously attributed to Bill Gates in the early days of computing.
This statement is attributed to Bill Gates in 1981, suggesting that 640 KB of memory should be sufficient for any computer user. At the time, memory limitations and technology were such that this amount of memory was considered substantial. However, the quote has since been misinterpreted and taken out of context, as it failed to consider the rapid advancement in technology and the increasing memory requirements of modern computing tasks.
Frederick Douglass, a prominent African American social reformer and abolitionist, is often attributed with this quote. It highlights his commitment to justice and his willingness to work collaboratively towards common goals, regardless of individuals' backgrounds or affiliations.
The Bill Gates RAM quote, "640K ought to be enough for anybody," is significant in the context of technology and innovation because it highlights the limitations of predicting future technological advancements. Gates made this statement in 1981, when 640K of RAM was considered a substantial amount of memory. However, as technology progressed, it became clear that more memory was needed to support increasingly complex software and applications. This quote serves as a reminder that innovation and technological progress are unpredictable, and what may seem sufficient at one point in time may become inadequate in the future.
This quote appears frequently on the Internet and is often attributed to Dr. Rogers with a date of 1931. In fact, this quote is part of a longer passage in Dr. Rogers' 1996 work Ten Secrets for a Successful Family (ISBN 978-0891078838).The passage is also often mis-quoted or mis-arranged. Here is the passage on page 138 where this famous quote appears:You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the industrious out of it. You don't multiply wealth by dividing it. Government cannot give anything to anybody that it doesn't first take from somebody else. Whenever somebody receives something without working for it, somebody else has to work for it without receiving. The worst thing that can happen to a nation is for half of the people to get the idea they don't have to work because somebody else will work for them, and the other half to get the idea that it does no good to work because they don't get to enjoy the fruit of their labor.
it means that your a loner and you don't need anybody you can take care of yourself
This statement is attributed to Bill Gates in 1981, suggesting that 640 KB of memory should be sufficient for any computer user. At the time, memory limitations and technology were such that this amount of memory was considered substantial. However, the quote has since been misinterpreted and taken out of context, as it failed to consider the rapid advancement in technology and the increasing memory requirements of modern computing tasks.
This is a hyperbole, which is an exaggerated statement used for effect.
Anything that doesn't offend anyone can be called non-offensive, or sometimes innocuous. Innocuous would work very well to apply to a statement.
I don't know if this helps, but "Hell no, we won't go" was a protest chanted at Vietnam war rallies. I'm not sure it was attributed to anybody.
No, the statement "It's ok to hate anybody" is not a pun in "To Kill a Mockingbird." It is a line spoken by Atticus Finch in the novel, emphasizing his belief in tolerance and understanding towards others.
The line "Has anybody seen my old friend Abraham" is from the song "The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia," which was famously sung by Vicki Lawrence. The song tells a story of betrayal and injustice in the South and was released in 1972. It has since been covered by various artists, including Reba McEntire.
Hey buddy I'm sorry to say that's not a question but a statement so how do you think anybody can answer your question.
No, nobody bought it. Except for those 30 million people, no one else. It wasn't the most popular computing device sold in 2011. Wait.... it was. Maybe somebody liked it.
I am answering the question right now. This means that the statement 'why doesn't anybody answer these questions' is an unanswerable question, because to answer the question, it would mean answering the question, making for a question that cannot be answered correctly. In other words, if I didn't answer the question, you would never know. If I did answer the question, then it would automatically prove the statement false. I am answering the question, therefore the question cannot be further explained.
Partially. It is the court which hears all claims by ANYBODY, against the government.
well they are probably most famously known for their song Prayer Of The Refugee, which was featured on guitar hero, i know that is where a lot of people first encountered the band! edit: If you were wondering, it's Guitar Hero 3, if anybody cared!
A Jacques Statement is one that is designed to fit almost anybody during a certain point in their life. For example, for someone in their early twenties, a Jacques Statement might allude to their feeling that they have more to offer than they are given credit for. Or someone in their forties that they regret leaving behind an important dream of their childhood.