In the simplest terms, evolution is synonymous with change. Life without change is stagnation; stagnation is the first step on the journey to death.
Try it this way: one of the least avoidable laws of nature and physics is entropy. It cannot be delayed, it cannot be denied. Entropy is change, and is likely a huge component of evolution.
So, short answer, no. Life would end without evolution.
Yes, humanists generally accept the theory of evolution as supported by scientific evidence. Evolution is considered a fundamental concept in humanist thought as it provides a natural explanation for the development of life on Earth without the need for supernatural intervention.
Yes, numbers are considered to be infinite because they can continue indefinitely without reaching an end.
No, it is not possible for society to exist without culture. Culture shapes the beliefs, values, norms, and behaviors of a society, providing a framework for social interactions and identity. Without culture, there would be no shared understanding or cohesion among individuals, leading to a breakdown of social order and organization.
It is not possible to determine if the person is lying without more information or evidence.
Yes, it is possible to live a life without computer networks. Many people around the world still live without regular access to computers or the internet, relying on traditional forms of communication and daily tasks. While computer networks have become essential for many aspects of modern life, it is still possible to lead a fulfilling life without them.
Without boys and girls on Earth, reproduction through sexual reproduction would not be possible, and the human species would not be able to continue through natural means. This would have severe consequences for the survival and evolution of the human race.
Without mutation there can be no evolution. Without evolution there can be no speciation.
Not biological evolution in the standard sense. No variation, genetic variability, and there is nothing for natural selection to select from.
Actually, it's life that has helped evolution to continue - or perhaps one might regard life and evolution as parts of the same complex thing. It's certainly impossible to consider one without the other.Evolution has helped life to adapt to changing circumstances, such as shifts in climates, or drifts in geology and geography, through natural selection - the weeding out of less reproductively fit variants.
No, evolution is not over. Whenever the environment changes, and it is changing all the time, life has to adapt. Even without environmental change, slow, gradual honing of species to their niches would continue, and there is also the matter of genetic drift.
Something that is 'sustained' lasts (prolonged for an extended period or without interruption) - therefore a sustained effect would be an effect that lasted.
No, but adaptive change would be difficult. Remember, evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. Mutation, genetic drift, genetic flow and other processes would continue without natural selection.
Perhaps not, but evolution can exist without natural selection.
Tetany (or tetanus, not to be confused with the disease called tetanus) is sustained contraction without any evidence of relaxation, often due to repeated stimulation.
Genetic variation is important for natural selection to drive evolution because it provides the raw material for natural selection to act upon. Without genetic variation, there would be no diversity in traits for natural selection to favor or eliminate, and evolution would not be possible.
Without evolution, the human race would still be swinging through the trees.
try the best you can