False. Aristotle believed that ignorance is not a valid excuse for bad behavior, as he emphasized the importance of moral responsibility and making informed choices based on knowledge and reason.
No, Aristotle did not believe that intoxication provided a legitimate excuse for bad moral behavior. He emphasized self-control and moderation as key virtues, and believed that individuals are responsible for their actions regardless of their state of intoxication.
Yes, "excuse" is an abstract noun. Abstract nouns refer to ideas, concepts, or qualities that cannot be perceived by the five senses. In this case, "excuse" represents a reason or justification for an action or behavior.
Reason and excuse are similar in that both are used to justify or explain a situation or behavior. However, a reason is usually based on logic or reality and provides a legitimate explanation, while an excuse may be seen as a way to avoid responsibility or consequences.
a reason usually is something that happened an excuse is uasually something that didn't happen that you said happened to bye time. but of course the person who says the excuse usually doesn't tell you they are making up an excuse X)
They changed their mind and no longer want to do it. It implies they had a lame excuse to not doing as they indicated they would do, or as they were obligated to do. A "cop out" is a lame excuse.
No, Aristotle did not believe that intoxication provided a legitimate excuse for bad moral behavior. He emphasized self-control and moderation as key virtues, and believed that individuals are responsible for their actions regardless of their state of intoxication.
The question is extremely unclear. . . BUT - - "Ignorance of the law is no excuse!"
Ignorance of the law is not an excuse because the legal system operates under the principle that individuals are expected to know and abide by the laws that govern them. Allowing ignorance as an excuse would undermine the integrity and effectiveness of the legal system by providing an easy way for individuals to escape accountability for their actions.
No. Ignorance is not an excuse to evade the law. Can a drunk driver evade a ticket and possible jail time by pleading ignorance? Can a hunter avoid being charged with hunting out of season (poaching) due to ignorance? The simple and lawful answer is NO.
Yes, he is still responsible for his crime. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. It is your duty as a citizen to know, understand, and obey the law. This is why laws are written.
The concept that "ignorance is 9/10 of the law" suggests that people who are unaware of the law may not be held accountable for breaking it. Ignorance can play a significant role in this concept as it implies that lack of knowledge about the law can sometimes serve as a defense or excuse for illegal actions.
I studied this in my 10th grade business law class. Ignorance is no excuse for not following the law. HOWEVER, if you end up in a case where you feel as though the law (ex. Speed Limit) was not properly displayed, then you could POSSIBLY fight that. But ignorance is NEVER an excuse.
Nope minor or not, Ignorance of the law is not a valid reason for committing a crime. Youth MAY be taken into consideration by a prosecutor & a judge, but that is up to them.
ignorant leges non excusat means that ignorance of a given law is not an excuse to that criminal charge.
An controlled behavior is a child who wants something like a lollipop from a man but she asks mommy first. She says "Excuse me Mommy can I have that lollipop that man is giving me?" Not interrupting but tapping and saying "excuse me" are signs of a controlled behavior
Randy excused Bob's behavior by saying he was under a lot of stress and not feeling well.
Yes, "excuse" is an abstract noun. Abstract nouns refer to ideas, concepts, or qualities that cannot be perceived by the five senses. In this case, "excuse" represents a reason or justification for an action or behavior.