answersLogoWhite

0

False. Aristotle believed that ignorance is not a valid excuse for bad behavior, as he emphasized the importance of moral responsibility and making informed choices based on knowledge and reason.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Aristotle believed that intoxication was a legitimate excuse for bad moral behavior?

No, Aristotle did not believe that intoxication provided a legitimate excuse for bad moral behavior. He emphasized self-control and moderation as key virtues, and believed that individuals are responsible for their actions regardless of their state of intoxication.


Can you be prosecuted for a crime if you dont know it exists?

The question is extremely unclear. . . BUT - - "Ignorance of the law is no excuse!"


Why is ignorance is no excuse of the law?

Ignorance of the law is not an excuse because the legal system operates under the principle that individuals are expected to know and abide by the laws that govern them. Allowing ignorance as an excuse would undermine the integrity and effectiveness of the legal system by providing an easy way for individuals to escape accountability for their actions.


Can a insurance billing specialist escape liability by pleading ignorance?

No. Ignorance is not an excuse to evade the law. Can a drunk driver evade a ticket and possible jail time by pleading ignorance? Can a hunter avoid being charged with hunting out of season (poaching) due to ignorance? The simple and lawful answer is NO.


If a citizen claims ignorance of the law is he responsible for his crime?

Yes, he is still responsible for his crime. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. It is your duty as a citizen to know, understand, and obey the law. This is why laws are written.


What role does ignorance play in the concept that "ignorance is 9/10 of the law"?

The concept that "ignorance is 9/10 of the law" suggests that people who are unaware of the law may not be held accountable for breaking it. Ignorance can play a significant role in this concept as it implies that lack of knowledge about the law can sometimes serve as a defense or excuse for illegal actions.


Can A citizen escape the consequences of breaking a law by proving they had no knowledge of that particular law?

I studied this in my 10th grade business law class. Ignorance is no excuse for not following the law. HOWEVER, if you end up in a case where you feel as though the law (ex. Speed Limit) was not properly displayed, then you could POSSIBLY fight that. But ignorance is NEVER an excuse.


Can a 17 years old boy say ignorance of a law is an excuse as being young?

Nope minor or not, Ignorance of the law is not a valid reason for committing a crime. Youth MAY be taken into consideration by a prosecutor & a judge, but that is up to them.


What are the distinction of ignorant leges non excusat?

ignorant leges non excusat means that ignorance of a given law is not an excuse to that criminal charge.


What is a controlled?

An controlled behavior is a child who wants something like a lollipop from a man but she asks mommy first. She says "Excuse me Mommy can I have that lollipop that man is giving me?" Not interrupting but tapping and saying "excuse me" are signs of a controlled behavior


What excuse did Randy make for Bob's behavior?

Randy excused Bob's behavior by saying he was under a lot of stress and not feeling well.


Is excuse an abstract noun?

Yes, "excuse" is an abstract noun. Abstract nouns refer to ideas, concepts, or qualities that cannot be perceived by the five senses. In this case, "excuse" represents a reason or justification for an action or behavior.