War is sometimes justified when it is necessary to defend against aggression, protect human rights, or restore peace and security.
War is sometimes justified when it is necessary to defend against aggression, protect innocent lives, or uphold important values such as freedom and justice.
War is sometimes considered justified when it is used as a last resort to protect a country's security or to defend against aggression.
The morality of engaging in war is a complex and debated issue. Some argue that it can be justified in certain circumstances, such as self-defense or protecting innocent people from harm. Others believe that war is never morally justifiable due to the harm and suffering it causes. Ultimately, the decision to engage in war should be carefully considered and weighed against ethical principles.
According to Saint Augustine, the purpose of war is to achieve peace and justice. He believed that war could be justified if it is waged to defend against aggression or tyranny, and if it is conducted with the intention of restoring order and protecting the innocent. Augustine emphasized the importance of just cause and proper authority in determining the legitimacy of war.
In the book "The Cay," Philip displays fear and uncertainty about the war, as it disrupts his life and separates him from his family. He struggles to understand the implications of the conflict and its impact on his future. However, as the story progresses, Philip gains a deeper understanding of the war's complexities and learns to adapt to his circumstances.
War is sometimes justified when it is necessary to defend against aggression, protect innocent lives, or uphold important values such as freedom and justice.
i don't think so
War is sometimes considered justified when it is used as a last resort to protect a country's security or to defend against aggression.
Killing another person is always a last resort. However, one is usually justified in a justifiable war and in self defense and the defense of others.
ww3...
This is a statement, not a question.
The morality of engaging in war is a complex and debated issue. Some argue that it can be justified in certain circumstances, such as self-defense or protecting innocent people from harm. Others believe that war is never morally justifiable due to the harm and suffering it causes. Ultimately, the decision to engage in war should be carefully considered and weighed against ethical principles.
Absent abnormal circumstances, probably never, objectively. However, subjectively, each or every side always have what they consider good reasons to fight. And, our military troops die, but men still love to fight. General George Patton said, on the battlefield,"God help me, but I love this. In many places, there has developed a "Just War Theory" or something similar which provides circumstances under which a war is justified. Typically, Just War requires that the war be defensive or at least in the protection of people. It requires the enemy to be avowed in his desire for conquest and/or pillaging and it requires that there be no peaceful alternative to armed conflict. Most people consider the Allies in World War II to have been fighting a Just War.
There have been a few just wars in the past. War can be justified if it is waged in order to defend yourself and your country and faith from invaders. War cannot be justified when it is offensive, instead of defensive. In other words, it is wrong to wage war if no one has attacked you or your country or your faith (eg. imperialist wars cannot be justified).
No , the "Rule of Law" should take precedence over political expediency .
Not sure what you mean by a fair war but it seem like you are talking about a justified war, which i a war of defense. If your country was invaded you would be justified in using military force to real your attackers
yes