The morality of engaging in war is a complex and debated issue. Some argue that it can be justified in certain circumstances, such as self-defense or protecting innocent people from harm. Others believe that war is never morally justifiable due to the harm and suffering it causes. Ultimately, the decision to engage in war should be carefully considered and weighed against ethical principles.
Firebombing during war raises ethical concerns due to the indiscriminate nature of the attacks, which can result in civilian casualties and extensive property damage. It also blurs the line between combatant and non-combatant, potentially violating principles of proportionality and distinction in the conduct of war. As such, many consider firebombing to be morally questionable and in need of careful scrutiny.
War is sometimes considered justified when it is used as a last resort to protect a country's security or to defend against aggression.
War is sometimes justified when it is necessary to defend against aggression, protect human rights, or restore peace and security.
I don't have personal preferences, but many readers find Odysseus to be the most compelling character in "The Odyssey." His cunning intelligence, resilience, and determination to return home after the Trojan War make him a complex and captivating hero.
This quote means that those who engage in conflict with others often have unresolved internal struggles and lack peace within themselves. It suggests that external conflicts can be reflective of inner turmoil and that finding peace within oneself is essential for cultivating peaceful relationships with others.
Tremendously Devastating. Do not ever engage with this nation.
Legally, to go to 'war' - the President generally asks to Congress to declare a state of war. It is assumed that Congress is a large enough body to determine what constitutes a justifiable war. Obviously, what is considered a justifiable use of military forces varies from person to person; no complete objective standard exists.
The view that nations are free to wage war only under certain conditions is called the just war theory. This theory outlines criteria for determining when the use of military force is morally justifiable, such as when there is a just cause, legitimate authority, and reasonable chance of success.
Peace movements generally include pacifists. They also include people who might not have a general objection to all war, but who object to a specific war for specific reasons. There is no philosophical inconsistency in believing that some wars are justifiable and some are not. Many people thought that the Vietnam war was not justifiable. Many others thought that no war is justifiable.
There is no justification for terrorism. There may be justification for terror... as in torture to get information that saves hundreds of lives. It is not black and white. There are, at least, hypothetical situations where terrorism can be morally justified. My question is if there are any real life situations that are arguably morally justifiable. On the other hand, terrorism employed in conjunction with guerrilla warfare in a protracted war of liberation may well prove useful and therefore also justified, as it did in Algeria and South Vietnam. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy .
War is the obtaining of a political goal by other than political means.
Why did the U.S. engage in the war of 1812?Answer this question…
Why did the U.S. engage in the war of 1812?Answer this question…
Yes, Ip Man did engage in a fight with a Japanese general during the Japanese occupation of China in World War II.
Engage in war unless invaded.
Letting another man die in the draft dodgers place is not morally justified.
Figure it out! FUMMIES!!!