There is evidence to suggest that the photos of the crowd at Trump's inauguration were manipulated or misrepresented. Discrepancies in crowd size estimates, comparison with previous inaugurations, and reports of editing techniques used on the photos all contribute to this claim.
There is evidence to suggest that Elon Musk may have exaggerated or misrepresented his educational background, particularly regarding his claim of having two degrees from Stanford University. This claim has been disputed by the university and there are discrepancies in Musk's own statements about his education.
The best question to ask when selecting evidence to support a claim is "Is the evidence credible and reliable?" It is essential to ensure that the evidence comes from a trustworthy source and is backed up by relevant data or research.
There is no scientific evidence to support the claimed benefits of the 432hz frequency. It is considered a hoax by the scientific community.
The argument from silence is when the absence of evidence is used to either support or refute a claim or theory. If there is no evidence to support a claim, it can be refuted using the argument from silence. Conversely, if there is a lack of evidence against a claim, it can be supported using the argument from silence.
Providing evidence to support an argument strengthens it by adding credibility and persuasiveness. It shows that the argument is based on facts and research, making it more convincing to the audience.
How might statistics be manipulated to support a certain point of view?
There is evidence to suggest that Elon Musk may have exaggerated or misrepresented his educational background, particularly regarding his claim of having two degrees from Stanford University. This claim has been disputed by the university and there are discrepancies in Musk's own statements about his education.
Corroborate means to strengthen or support with evidence.
Appeal to science is a rhetorical strategy that emphasizes scientific authority or findings to support a claim or argument. It suggests that a position is valid or credible simply because it is backed by scientific evidence or consensus. However, this appeal can sometimes be misleading if the science is misrepresented, cherry-picked, or taken out of context. It is essential to critically evaluate the quality and relevance of the scientific evidence being presented.
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
NEVER PAY CHILD SUPPORT WITH A COURT ORDER AND THROUGH THE COURTS, OTHERWISE IT CAN BE CONSIDERED A GIFT.see links
Does this evidence support what I am trying to say
Fossils support his hypothesis.
Presumably, it is in reference to the evidence that will be, or was, presented in support of the prosecution.
the holy books are the evidence
Yes, DNA testing can provide evidence to support the claim that he is not the father.
Fjh