0
There cannot be a best argument against the existence of God because I am a living evidence for the existence of God. If you know me, you will understand.
I am surrounded by lot of negative forces (spirits). I am scolding them daily. I think most of the people or almost all people are hearing my voices as well as evil spirits’ voices everyday.
At present all creatures including human beings are living in a miraculous era of God. This is a temporary miracle of God. I am connected to all creatures including human beings and spirits internally by God since year 1950 but I am not a God. I think that all human beings can see what I see, can hear what I hear and even know my thoughts. But thoughts are complicated matter. It needs an explanation. The people who have born in this era cannot realize this miracle because they have born with it. An old brave and honest gentleman aged 85 can explain about this miracle.
God never bothers whether people believe in him or not. God's direct intervention in individuals' affairs is very rare. God doesn't watch each and every human being at the same time and cannot live with each and everyone to guide them. These works are done by the spirits. God had created different kinds of spirits for various purposes. He had made the spirits to watch, guide and determine the destiny of the human beings from their daily activities, talks and thoughts too. Your past determines your present and your present determines your future. God has given freewill to all creatures including human beings. According to this, all human beings have all right to live a life as they wish. But if it happens to be bad and hurts someone, they have to face the consequences. These consequences are created by spirits. It's a natural system. After death no one lives in any form. Heaven and hell are only for spirits, not for human beings. God is a mystery even to the spirits. Spirits are not eternal beings but their lifetime is long. Spirits are separate elements. A human being during his/her lifetime is living with many spirits which have joined one by one since birth. They are knowledge, skills, feelings, emotions, instincts, interests and everything. Further there will be always some spirits with you on behalf of your parents, friends, relatives and Gods you believe. Only these spirits make you remember them in a certain situations. All of these spirits are your consciousnesses and memories. Even thoughts are not your own. For example, when you want to take a decision on a subject, one after another the spirits think and you just listen, choose or reject the ideas which they transmit to your mind through your brain in the form of thoughts. A mind is a group/formation of many spirits which have joined one by one since birth. A mind is just like a computer's mind. After the computer is completely destroyed you will not get its mind. The same is the case with the human beings. A brain is a device used by the spirits to control the body and mind. (A senior spirit or a chief can control other spirits) A human being doesn't have a spiritual body. Soul is an energy needed for the functionality of a body. It is not a spirit or anything else. A body's functionality is based on the auto mechanism. After death all spirits which accompanied a person quit and go to different places searching new bodies. No one lives after death in any form. All human beings are just robots made of flesh and bones and toys of the spirits for their games.
What else can I help you with?
Why is the moral argument called the moral argument?
The moral argument is called that because it is an argument for the existence of God based on the existence of objective moral values and duties. It suggests that the existence of moral values points towards the existence of a moral lawgiver, which is typically identified as God.
Is the ontological argument deductive or inductive?
The ontological argument is a deductive argument. It aims to prove the existence of God based on the concept of God as a necessary being. It uses logical reasoning to demonstrate that the existence of God is a necessary consequence of the definition of God as a perfect being.
How do you explain the ontological argument for the existence of God?
The ontological argument posits that the concept of God as a perfect being necessitates His existence. It argues that if we can conceive of a being that possesses all perfections (including existence), then that being must exist in reality. Critics argue that existence is not a property that adds to the perfection of a being and that the argument relies heavily on the assumption that existence is a predicate.
What is Aquinas' Third Way argument for the existence of God?
Aquinas' Third Way argument for the existence of God is based on the idea that there must be a necessary being that causes all other beings to exist. This necessary being is what we call God, who is the ultimate source of existence and order in the universe.
What evidence or arguments can be presented to support the existence of a higher power, specifically in relation to the topic of proving the existence of God?
Evidence for the existence of a higher power, such as God, can include philosophical arguments like the cosmological argument, teleological argument, and moral argument. These arguments suggest that the complexity of the universe, the order and design in nature, and the existence of objective moral values point towards the existence of a higher power. Additionally, personal experiences, historical accounts, and religious texts are often cited as evidence for the existence of God.
In the book 'The Existence of God' what is an argument against complexity in nature?
Nature is complex; I don't know how anyone could put forth a reasonable argument otherwise.
Why is the moral argument called the moral argument?
The moral argument is called that because it is an argument for the existence of God based on the existence of objective moral values and duties. It suggests that the existence of moral values points towards the existence of a moral lawgiver, which is typically identified as God.
When was The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God created?
The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God was created in 1763.
Is the ontological argument deductive or inductive?
The ontological argument is a deductive argument. It aims to prove the existence of God based on the concept of God as a necessary being. It uses logical reasoning to demonstrate that the existence of God is a necessary consequence of the definition of God as a perfect being.
What is an ontological argument?
The ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that is based on the concept of existence or being. It suggests that the very concept of God being the greatest possible being necessarily implies his existence. This argument has been presented and debated by various philosophers throughout history, such as Anselm of Canterbury and René Descartes.
What theory maintains that the universe exist and appears for some reason and is an argument for the existence of god?
The theory that maintains that the universe exists for a reason and argues for the existence of God is known as the teleological argument or the argument from design. This argument posits that the intricate design and complexity observed in the universe suggest the existence of an intelligent designer, which is often equated with God.
What is an argument from design?
An argument from design is a theological term for a teleological argument - an argument for the existence of God, such that because nature is orderly, it is evidence of a designer.
How do you explain the ontological argument for the existence of God?
The ontological argument posits that the concept of God as a perfect being necessitates His existence. It argues that if we can conceive of a being that possesses all perfections (including existence), then that being must exist in reality. Critics argue that existence is not a property that adds to the perfection of a being and that the argument relies heavily on the assumption that existence is a predicate.
What does ontologically mean?
there are three definitions: # Of or relating to ontology. # Of or relating to essence or the nature of being. # Of or relating to the argument for the existence of God holding that the existence of the concept of God entails the existence of God.
What is Aquinas' Third Way argument for the existence of God?
Aquinas' Third Way argument for the existence of God is based on the idea that there must be a necessary being that causes all other beings to exist. This necessary being is what we call God, who is the ultimate source of existence and order in the universe.
What is the argument?
One of the arguments for the existence of God, which points out that ethics are without absolutes apart from God
What religious groups support the ontological argument of the existence of God?
The ontological argument of the exsitance of god is supported by abrahmic religions. It is not widely practiced in the current day.
