0
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between subjective and objective law?
Subjective law is based on personal opinions, beliefs, or feelings, while objective law is based on facts, evidence, and established rules or principles.
What is an objective conclusion?
An objective conclusion is a statement or judgment that is based on facts, evidence, and logic rather than personal feelings or opinions. It is a perspective that is unbiased and can be supported by verifiable information.
What is the difference between the right of nature and the law of nature?
The right of nature refers to the inherent freedom individuals have to protect themselves and their interests, while the law of nature is a set of moral principles that govern human behavior and interactions.
What is the difference between natural law and natural rights?
Natural law refers to a set of moral principles believed to be inherent in nature and applicable to all people, while natural rights are specific rights that individuals possess by virtue of being human, such as the right to life, liberty, and property.
How and why values are subjective and objective for existentialists?
Existentialists = a philosopher who emphasizes freedom of choice and personal responsibility but who regards human existence in a hostile universe as unexplainable (wordnet) Subjective = taking place within the mind and modified by individual bias Objective = belonging to immediate experience of actual things or events Personal responsibility and the degree of it is subjective and objective as a person will always decide at some point that *something* exists outside his/her realm of responsibility. As they believe in a hostile universe, there is no reason to act for the good of anyone else in a case like that or step out of their limit of responsibility. For all they know, that step could go against them. And as we all know, freedom of choice is subjective. What do we mean by it? Freedom of choice in stealing cars? Or freedom of choice in which dog steak to buy at that road-side stall? The interpretation depends on the person. The key in understanding why no two existentialists' values will be the same is in the last part of that definition courtesy of wordnet: "human existence in a hostile universe as unexplainable". Law and authority are chaotic. The individual suffers under the system. There is only the certainty of death. The sufficiently motivated E-list (I got tired of typing that word, sorry) may attempt to seek out meaning for life anyway - it's one of those innate human needs. And because they have nothing to go by - just the atheistic, philosophic mindset - who knows how they will interpret the situations they come across in life to create or cross-out the whys of existence? IN short: what has the existentialist to go by?
What is the difference between subjective and objective law?
Subjective law is based on personal opinions, beliefs, or feelings, while objective law is based on facts, evidence, and established rules or principles.
What is the difference between subjective and objective foreseeability?
In law, foreseeable subjective is would be what someone literally saw or knew, and foreseeable objective would be what a reasonable person in that situation would have seen or knew about that situation.
What does subjective law mean?
My guess is that this comes from a translation from a language such as German, Czech, Slovak or perhaps other languages, where an analogous term is used. The definition is approximately as follows: Subjective law (or rather right) is a specific possibility of a subject to behave in certain way envisaged by the law (i.e., by the "objective law"), to require certain behaviour from other entities, to exercise certain entitlements and to require from state authorities to enforce certain behaviour from an obliged entity. (Approximate modified translation from Slovak Wikipedia.) So it is quite apparent that "subjective law" is a calque and I would propose a clearer English equivalent: entitlement (although some claim this is not quite synonymous). If anyone has a better idea, please, contribute! Milan P.S. There is another explanation - in the languages mentioned, "law" and "right" translate into the same word. And to distinguish between them, they use adjectives "objective" for "law" and "subjective" for "right". So "subjective law" could then simply be a "right".
Can you think of a less subjective alternative for when a witness in court of law is asked to swear to tell the truth the whole truth nothing but he truth?
No. The oath is objective, not subjective. The witness is asked to testify to the objective truth. We could make it more subjective (by saying "do you swear to tell what you believe to be the truth" or words to that effect) but not less so.
What is the difference between the humanitarian law and international law?
the difference is this is small and that is big
What is the difference between newton's first law and law of inertia?
There is no difference. They are the same.
What are the foundations of the natural moral law-Is the natural moral law objective or subjective?
The world of duality which we perceive is objective.It cannot stand without consciousness.So moral laws spring from inside and artificially imposed outside.Morals are for individual.For groups,the moral law is superfluous!!! Answer Moral laws are those laws which have been acceptable to society from time immemorial. They are objective i.e They have a goal which is intended to be attained. Subjective are laws that are modified by individual bias
What is the difference between customary law and indigenous law?
None.
Difference between public law and private law in India?
law and rules
What is the difference between law of return to variable proportion and law or return to scale?
There is a big difference between both the laws.The basi difference between them is that i dont know 1st but i know the 2nd one
What is the difference between colonial law English law?
colonial law is not law are rules of english law
What is the difference between governing and ruling law?
?
