My guess is that this comes from a translation from a language such as German, Czech, Slovak or perhaps other languages, where an analogous term is used. The definition is approximately as follows: Subjective law (or rather right) is a specific possibility of a subject to behave in certain way envisaged by the law (i.e., by the "objective law"), to require certain behaviour from other entities, to exercise certain entitlements and to require from state authorities to enforce certain behaviour from an obliged entity. (Approximate modified translation from Slovak Wikipedia.)
So it is quite apparent that "subjective law" is a calque and I would propose a clearer English equivalent: entitlement (although some claim this is not quite synonymous). If anyone has a better idea, please, contribute!
Milan
P.S.
There is another explanation - in the languages mentioned, "law" and "right" translate into the same word. And to distinguish between them, they use adjectives "objective" for "law" and "subjective" for "right". So "subjective law" could then simply be a "right".
Subjective laws refer to rules or principles that are based on personal feelings, opinions, or beliefs. Objective laws, on the other hand, are rules or principles that are based on outside observations or facts, independent of personal viewpoints.
To repeal a law means to officially revoke or annul that law, rendering it no longer in effect. This can be done through a legislative process where a new law is passed specifically to remove the old law from the legal system.
The law of large numbers states that as the number of observations in a sample increases, the sample mean will tend to approach the population mean. In other words, the larger the sample size, the more accurate the estimate of the population parameter. This law forms the basis for statistical inference and hypothesis testing.
The State decided to revoke the law. Is the same as... The State decided to repeal the law.
The word "law" in French is translated as "loi." It refers to a set of rules and regulations established by a government or authority to maintain order within a society.
Subjective law is based on personal opinions, beliefs, or feelings, while objective law is based on facts, evidence, and established rules or principles.
That depends on your perspective
Objective law refers to laws that are based on facts and evidence, applying universally to all individuals. Subjective law, on the other hand, is influenced by personal opinions, beliefs, or interpretations, and may vary depending on the individual or situation.
This being a subjective concept I would say natural moral law :)
a subjective shot showing what a character is seeing.
This being a subjective concept I would say natural moral law :)
Hillary June Law has written: 'The effects of a rotating circumcerebral magnetic field upon hypnotizability and subjective experiences'
In law, foreseeable subjective is would be what someone literally saw or knew, and foreseeable objective would be what a reasonable person in that situation would have seen or knew about that situation.
Depends on what you mean by "healthy" as this question is subjective.
That people have different ideas about it
Nostradamus's predictions are subjective. You can interpret them to mean anything.
There is no such word as "symotoms". -You may mean "symptoms" which mean a subjective indication of a disorder or disease, such as pain, nausea, or weakness.