answersLogoWhite

0

Presumptive arguments are based on plausibility, which is whether a statement seems true in normal situations. The conclusion from the argument is tentatively acceptable if the premises are true. However, presumptive or plausible reasoning give way to inductive arguments. It is easy in this sort of argument to be wrong when new evidence is discovered.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

What are deductive arguments based on?

Deductive arguments are based on logical reasoning, where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. In a deductive argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This form of reasoning aims to demonstrate the validity of the conclusion through the structure of the argument.


Do you find the arguments advanced in the quotations moralistic and abstract?

No, the arguments presented in the quotations are based on specific principles or values but are not necessarily moralistic or overly abstract. They are concise statements that convey a particular perspective or idea.


Why Back up your arguments with evidence?

Backing up your arguments with evidence adds credibility and provides support for your claims. It helps to show that your arguments are well-researched, logical, and based on factual information, increasing the persuasiveness of your point of view and making it easier for others to understand and accept your perspective.


What is a non-deductive argument and how does it differ from deductive arguments?

A non-deductive argument is a type of reasoning where the conclusion is not guaranteed to be true based on the premises. This differs from deductive arguments, where the conclusion must logically follow from the premises. Non-deductive arguments rely on probability or likelihood rather than certainty.


Can you provide an example of an ampliative argument and explain how it differs from a deductive argument?

An example of an ampliative argument is: "All observed swans are white, so all swans are white." This argument makes a generalization based on limited evidence. The key difference between ampliative and deductive arguments is that deductive arguments aim to guarantee the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true, while ampliative arguments only provide probable support for the conclusion based on the premises.

Related Questions

What has the author M L Hurlbut written?

M. L. Hurlbut has written: 'Presumptive arguments in favor of Unitarianism' -- subject(s): Unitarianism


What is presumptive thought?

Presumptive thought involves making a judgment or forming an opinion without having all the relevant information or evidence. It is based on assumptions rather than facts or conclusive evidence. Presumptive thoughts can lead to biases and errors in decision-making.


What is a presumptive test?

Presumptive test to confirmation of coliforms bacteria in the samples


Is a breathalyzer a presumptive test?

Yes, in most states the breathalyzer is seen as a presumptive test.


What is the adjective for presumption?

presumptive


What principle is the study of anatomy and physiology based?

arguments


How is Prince William heir presumptive?

Prince William is heir apparent, not heir presumptive, no birth can displace him in the line of succession.


The constitutional grounds on which each side based its arguments and the specific arguments each side presented?

Reno v. Condon


What is presumptive sentencing?

Presumptive sentencing is the explanation of penalties in relation to a set of law infringements. These would be a normal sentence for any offense made.


Is large cell b-cell lymhoma agent orange presumptive?

is large cell b-cell lymphoma agent orange presumptive


What is presumptive test?

Presumptive test to confirmation of coliforms bacteria in the samples


The persuasive antislavery arguments of Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Truth were based on?

Based on their own experience as slaves.