The presumptive argument forms are:
Appeal to Expert Opinion-
A is an expert in subject B
A asserts C about B
C may plausibly be taken to be true about B
Position to know- In this form, you look at other people familiar with something, what they do, you should do. An example of this is:
Bob is not from New Orleans, and is not familiar with the laws there.
He doesn't know whether or not to yield to pedestrians.
He sees the other people are yielding to pedestrians, therefore he yields to pedestrians.
Popular Opinion- The use of polls or surveys to gather data. The argument structure for this is:
A is generally accepted as true.
If A is generally accepted as true, that gives a reason in favor of A.
There is a reason in favor of A.
Correlation to Cause-
If there is a positive correlation between A and B.
Therefore A causes B.
There is a negative correlation between A and B.
Therefore A prevents B.
Argument from Consequences-
If A is brought about, good consequences will probably occur.
A should be brought about.
If A is brought about, bad consequences will probably occur.
A should not be brought about.
Slippery Slope-A form of negative reasoning from consequence; once the first step is taken, it will lead to a chain reaction to a negative consequence.
Presumptive arguments are based on plausibility, which is whether a statement seems true in normal situations. The conclusion from the argument is tentatively acceptable if the premises are true. However, presumptive or plausible reasoning give way to inductive arguments. It is easy in this sort of argument to be wrong when new evidence is discovered.
One effective argument of Sojourner Truth is her appeal to basic human rights and dignity. By emphasizing the inherent worth and equality of all individuals, regardless of race or gender, she challenges the existing social norms and power structures that perpetuated inequality. This argument resonates with people's sense of justice and morality, making her message compelling and persuasive.
Parallelism is used by repeating similar grammatical structures or patterns to emphasize key points in the argument. This repetition helps to make the argument more memorable and impactful for the audience by drawing attention to important details or ideas in a clear and structured way. It can also create a sense of balance and harmony in the argument, reinforcing its coherence and persuasiveness.
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
The three argument types are deductive, inductive, and presumptive. Their differences are based on the strictness of the connection of the premises to the conclusion.Deductive: In a valid deductive argument, if the premises are true, by logical necessity, the conclusion must be true. There is a strict link between the premises and the conclusion. It is logically impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. There are multiple types of deductive arguments shown in the related question below.Inductive: Not such a strict link between premises and the conclusion. Inductive is usually based on probability (and therefore may contain statistics and percentages). So if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true. Keywords in an inductive argument include some, most, usually, typically, and other words that suggest that not all things mentioned in the premises are or do what is suggested. It is pretty much a yes or no argument, either deductively valid or not.Presumptive: In this case, the presumption is based on probability, it is tentatively acceptable if the premises are true. This type of argument is usually used when there is no evidence suggesting the contrary, in which case the argument would be proved wrong.
Presumptive arguments are based on plausibility, which is whether a statement seems true in normal situations. The conclusion from the argument is tentatively acceptable if the premises are true. However, presumptive or plausible reasoning give way to inductive arguments. It is easy in this sort of argument to be wrong when new evidence is discovered.
Presumptive test to confirmation of coliforms bacteria in the samples
Yes, in most states the breathalyzer is seen as a presumptive test.
presumptive
Prince William is heir apparent, not heir presumptive, no birth can displace him in the line of succession.
Presumptive sentencing is the explanation of penalties in relation to a set of law infringements. These would be a normal sentence for any offense made.
is large cell b-cell lymphoma agent orange presumptive
Presumptive test to confirmation of coliforms bacteria in the samples
Presumptive thought involves making a judgment or forming an opinion without having all the relevant information or evidence. It is based on assumptions rather than facts or conclusive evidence. Presumptive thoughts can lead to biases and errors in decision-making.
From the stand point of the criminal justice system it's not only used, but requested, ordered, and received. A presumptive sentence is used when a person is convicted of a crime that has a specific sentence. Presumptive sentencing is similar to a mandatory sentence, however a mandatory sentence is a minimum were a presumptive sentence has no maximum or minimum. It only carries a specific fine, program enrollment, or amount of incarceration time. From a grammar stand point you could use the statement "the defendant received a presumptive sentence." I hope this answers the question well enough.
Presumptive easement occurs when the access or easement has been used for so many years it has become an established easement. The owners permission is not necessary if they allowed it to go for years without complaint.
Presumptive tax is a way of applying a tax using indirect methods. These methods may be income reconstruction, or other methods. This is a good way to ensure the tax is not avoided.