0
What else can I help you with?
What makes an argument valid?
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Validity is not concerned with the truth of the premises or conclusion, only the logical relationship between them.
What are presumptive arguments based on?
Presumptive arguments are based on plausibility, which is whether a statement seems true in normal situations. The conclusion from the argument is tentatively acceptable if the premises are true. However, presumptive or plausible reasoning give way to inductive arguments. It is easy in this sort of argument to be wrong when new evidence is discovered.
What is the difference between a premise and an assumption?
A premise is a statement or idea that serves as the basis for an argument or reasoning, while an assumption is a belief or idea that is taken for granted without being proven. In other words, a premise is a starting point for an argument, while an assumption is a belief that is not necessarily proven.
What are fallacies of presumption?
Fallacies of presumption occur when an argument is based on an unjustified assumption or presupposition. Examples include begging the question (assuming the truth of the conclusion in the premise), false dilemma (presenting only two options when more exist), and complex question (posing a question that assumes something not yet proven).
What is begging the question mean?
"Begging the question" is a little understood and much misused phrase. It refers to the logical fallacy of asking someone to accept your conclusion as a premise. Logical argument is supposed to proceed from statements which everyone accepts to others which are debatable. A question-begging argument assumes the question under debate as a premise.At its simplest, it might go like this:A: Prove to me that Jimmy Hoffa was abducted by aliens.B: OK. Let's assume that Jimmy Hoffa was abducted by aliens.A: All right.B: Well, if that's the case then obviously Hoffa wasabducted by aliens. There's your proof.A more complicated (but very common) form involves assuming two propositions which prove each other.A: Prove to me that the Bible is the Word of God and that it is always true.B: Well, the Bible is the Word of God, so it must be true.A: But how do you prove that the Bible is the Word of God?B: The Bible must be the word of God, because it says so in the Bible, and the Bible is always true.Since both "The Bible is the Word of God" and "The Bible is always true" are propositions to be proven, B cannot base his argument on either of them, so the above argument is question-begging. If A accepted either one, B could legitimately derive the other from it.
What makes an argument valid?
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Validity is not concerned with the truth of the premises or conclusion, only the logical relationship between them.
One way to think of a conclusion is as a that has been proven to be valid?
A conclusion can be thought of as a logical inference that has been supported with evidence and reasoning throughout the argument. It is the final piece that ties together the premises and leads to a definitive statement or decision.
A hypothesis only becomes a valid argument conclusion after it has been?
C. testedtested and proven to be true.
What is a math argument?
A math argument is a logical reasoning process used to establish the truth of a mathematical statement or theorem. It typically involves a series of steps that connect premises to a conclusion, utilizing definitions, axioms, and previously proven theorems. A valid math argument must be clear, concise, and follow rigorous logical principles, ensuring that each step is justified. Ultimately, it aims to persuade others of the validity of the conclusion through sound reasoning.
Which term describes an argument that has not yet been proven?
An argument that has not been proven is a theory or a claim.
What are presumptive arguments based on?
Presumptive arguments are based on plausibility, which is whether a statement seems true in normal situations. The conclusion from the argument is tentatively acceptable if the premises are true. However, presumptive or plausible reasoning give way to inductive arguments. It is easy in this sort of argument to be wrong when new evidence is discovered.
What is a hypothesis that has been proven again and again?
A Conclusion.
What is a reasonable argument?
A reasonable argument is one that is logical, supported by evidence, and free from fallacies or emotional manipulation. It should be based on sound reasoning and relevant information, leading to a conclusion that is justified and persuasive. In essence, a reasonable argument is one that can withstand critical scrutiny and is open to being evaluated and potentially revised based on new evidence or counterarguments.
Is a hypothesis a proven fact?
A hypothesis is the idea of what the conclusion will be of your experiment.
What is a factual detail?
A factual detail is a specific piece of information that can be validated or proven to be true. It is a detail that is based on concrete evidence or data, often used to support an argument or conclusion.
What name is given to a statement that has been proven by deductive reasoning?
conclusion
What is a mathematical statement consisting of a hypothesis and conclusion that has to be proven true?
Diagram
