0
He basically said that heavier things fall faster.
This is not true. Here's a reductio ad absurdum argument to show that it can't be true.
Suppose that it IS true. Now drop a 10 pound cannonball and a 20 pound cannonball from the same height. Obviously, the 20 pound cannonball hits the ground first. (Remember, we're assuming Aristotle was right.)
Now let's take a string and connect the two cannonballs. The twenty-pound cannonball will fall faster than the ten-pound cannonball ... until they pull the string taut. Now what happens? Does the heavy ball speed the light one up, or does the light ball slow the heavy one down? Do they fall at the average speed of the two? And how do the cannonballs know they're tied together so they know how to fall?
What else can I help you with?
What idea of Aristotle's was later proved incorrect?
Aristotle stated that a falling object accelerated in accordance with its mass, again Aristotle was provedwrong.
What was Aristotle's theory about gravity?
Aristotle did not have a specific theory of gravity as we understand it today. He believed in the natural motion of objects toward their natural place in the universe (e.g., heavier objects falling towards Earth, and lighter objects rising). His view was different from the modern understanding of gravity as a force of attraction between objects with mass.
What did Aristotle think was the natural state of objects?
Aristotle believed that the natural state of objects was to seek a state of rest or motion that was in accordance with their inherent properties. He classified objects into four elements (earth, water, air, fire) and believed that each element had a natural place in the cosmos.
How would Aristotle explain A falling rock?
Aristotle would explain a falling rock by saying that the rock's natural place is on the ground, so it falls towards the Earth to reach that place. He would describe it as the natural motion of the rock seeking its proper location.
What were the results of Galileo's experiment on falling objects?
Galileo's experiment on falling objects showed that objects of different weights fall at the same rate, disproving the common belief at the time that heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones.
What idea of Aristotle's was later proved incorrect?
Aristotle stated that a falling object accelerated in accordance with its mass, again Aristotle was provedwrong.
What was Aristotle's belief regarding falling objects with different masses?
More massive objects fall faster than less massive objects.
What was Aristotle's theory about gravity?
Aristotle did not have a specific theory of gravity as we understand it today. He believed in the natural motion of objects toward their natural place in the universe (e.g., heavier objects falling towards Earth, and lighter objects rising). His view was different from the modern understanding of gravity as a force of attraction between objects with mass.
According to Aristotle What kinds if motion require no force?
Aristotle believed that natural motion, such as objects falling downward or fire rising upward, did not require any external force to occur. These types of motion were thought to be inherent to the nature of the objects themselves.
From Aristotle what kinds of motion required no forces?
According to Aristotle, natural motion did not require any external forces. This included movements such as falling objects seeking their natural place or celestial bodies moving in their orbits.
How does gravity affect the veloctiy of falling objects?
The force of gravity will accelerate the falling objects towards itself.
How was Aristotle's dynamic motion theory proven wrong?
Aristotle's dynamic motion theory was proven wrong by a man named Galileo. He tested Aristotle's theory by dropping a heavy object and a lighter object at the same time. The experiment proved Aristotle wrong because the result was that the two objects were falling at the same rate (speed).
Why did peoples' views of Aristotle hinder progress in science in western Europe for well over a thousand years?
because he brought up something with falling objects and people have been seeking the knowledge to learn more
What did Aristotle say about inertia?
Aristotle did not have a concept of inertia per se. He believed that objects moved because they were subject to an external force, and that there was no need for a specific force to keep an object in motion. It was Galileo who later introduced the concept of inertia as a property of matter.
What was Aristotle's theory on space?
Aristotle believed that space was defined by the presence of objects and did not exist independently of matter. He proposed that space was the void left by surrounding objects. This view was in contrast to theories that suggested space was a separate entity that could exist on its own.
Do objects that are falling in free fall have a constant acceleration?
Yes, objects falling in free fall have a constant acceleration due to gravity.
Did Aristotle believe all objects fall at the same rate of speed?
No, Aristotle believed that different objects fall at different rates of speed based on their weight. He thought that heavier objects fell faster than lighter objects. This view was later disproven by Galileo's experiments on gravity.
