Thomas Hobbes said that absolute rulers were needed because citizens were not able to run a government on their own. He believed a society without absolute monarchy would end up at war.
John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Thomas Hobbes each supported different theories of government. Hobbes believed in absolute monarchy to maintain order; Locke argued for a social contract between people and rulers, with emphasis on individual rights; Rousseau advocated for a more direct democracy where citizens have a say in governance.
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both were political philosophers who explored the concept of social contract. However, they had differing views on human nature. Hobbes believed that humans are inherently selfish and require a strong central authority to prevent chaos, while Locke argued that humans are rational beings with natural rights and should have a say in their government.
Hobbes believed in an absolute monarchy as the ideal form of government to maintain order and prevent chaos. Rousseau, on the other hand, preferred a form of direct democracy where all citizens have a say in decision-making to promote freedom and equality.
Thomas Hobbes believed that civil society organizations, such as the government, were created by a social contract among individuals who surrendered some of their freedoms to a central authority in exchange for protection and security. In his view, without this social contract, human life would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short in a state of nature.
Thomas Hobbes believed that people often fail to see the importance of truth until after they have experienced the consequences of their actions. This delayed realization can lead to regret and suffering, akin to the idea of hell as a place of punishment for not embracing truth sooner. In essence, he was emphasizing the importance of understanding and accepting reality in a timely manner to avoid undesirable outcomes.
Thomas Hobbes put forth his idea about society and individuals with the basic premise that everyone acts in their own self interest. Hobbes had allot more to say about this and other areas of society in the 17th Century.
Thomas Hobbes
John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Thomas Hobbes each supported different theories of government. Hobbes believed in absolute monarchy to maintain order; Locke argued for a social contract between people and rulers, with emphasis on individual rights; Rousseau advocated for a more direct democracy where citizens have a say in governance.
Thomas Hobbes
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both were political philosophers who explored the concept of social contract. However, they had differing views on human nature. Hobbes believed that humans are inherently selfish and require a strong central authority to prevent chaos, while Locke argued that humans are rational beings with natural rights and should have a say in their government.
I'm not sure what specific conversation you are referring to. However, Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher who wrote in English, so he wouldn't have spoken in Syrian Aramaic. Azazel is a demon mentioned in Jewish tradition, but there is no known interaction recorded between Hobbes and Azazel in Syrian Aramaic.
Hobbes believed in an absolute monarchy as the ideal form of government to maintain order and prevent chaos. Rousseau, on the other hand, preferred a form of direct democracy where all citizens have a say in decision-making to promote freedom and equality.
Thomas Hobbes believed that civil society organizations, such as the government, were created by a social contract among individuals who surrendered some of their freedoms to a central authority in exchange for protection and security. In his view, without this social contract, human life would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short in a state of nature.
Well being that Thomas Hobbes remained single and in the company of young boys I would say that he was the modern day Michael Jackson of Liberal Philosophy. The excerpts are from the Wikipedia Bio of Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes was educated at Westport church from the age of four, passed to the Malmesbury school and then to a private school kept by a young man named Robert Latimer, a graduate of Oxford University. Hobbes became a companion to the younger William and they both took part in a grand tour in 1610. his task, chiefly spent in Paris, ended in 1631 when he again found work with the Cavendish family, tutoring the son of his previous pupil for 7 years. In 1647, Hobbes was engaged as mathematical instructor to the young Charles, Prince of Wales,[2] who had come over from Jersey around July. This engagement lasted until 1648 when Charles went to Holland. Not only would he be for Gay Marriage but would probably belong to NAMBLA
reason why is if you have a government that runs on an absolutism system you and everyone else in the nation would be subject to the rulers ideas without a say in anything that is done. The ruler has absolute power.
Thomas Hobbes believed that people often fail to see the importance of truth until after they have experienced the consequences of their actions. This delayed realization can lead to regret and suffering, akin to the idea of hell as a place of punishment for not embracing truth sooner. In essence, he was emphasizing the importance of understanding and accepting reality in a timely manner to avoid undesirable outcomes.
The idea of divine right (or natural law) is the idea that the will of god is being enacted through one man (king/ Monarchic/ Hegemon/ Emperor/ G.W. Bush i.e. whatever) He (I only say he because we all know it wouldn't be a woman ;) He is the tool of god on earth so to speak. Natural law afforded Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) theopportunity to come up with absolutism the idea that all people turn power over to one man to protect all men (George Washington/ Abraham Lincoln/ Obama)