0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What taught that people need a strong ruler to maintain order?
If people didn't have a strong ruler all people would be in chaos.
Why did Thomas Hobbes believe the people needed an absolute ruler?
Thomas Hobbes believed that people needed an absolute ruler to prevent chaos and maintain social order. He argued that without a strong central authority, individuals would act in their self-interest and engage in a constant state of war, making life solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. A strong ruler, in Hobbes' view, was essential for maintaining peace and stability in society.
What sort of a ruler did Hobbes believe was the best for Society?
Hobbes believed that an absolute ruler with strong centralized power was best for society, as he argued that this would prevent the chaos and conflict that arise from individual self-interest. This ruler would provide security and maintain order, reducing the state of nature where life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.
Who believed that life without an absolute ruler would be nasty brutish and short?
Thomas Hobbes, a philosopher, believed that life without an absolute ruler would be chaotic and unstable. In his work "Leviathan," he argues that a strong, central authority is necessary to prevent the state of nature, where individuals act in their self-interest and conflict is common.
Which enlightenment thinker taught that life is brutish and societies need strong rulers?
Thomas Hobbes taught that life is brutish and societies need strong rulers to maintain order and prevent chaos. He believed in a social contract where individuals would give up some freedoms in exchange for protection and security from a powerful government.
Who wrote in its natural state the life of humankind would be nasty brutish and short?
Thomas Hobbes wrote that in the state of nature, human life would be "nasty, brutish, and short." This comes from his famous work "Leviathan" where he argues that without a social contract and strong central authority, humans would be in a perpetual state of conflict.
What where Thomas Hobbes ideas about government?
Thomas Hobbes believed in a social contract theory where people gave up some of their individual rights to a sovereign ruler in exchange for security and order. He argued that a strong central authority was necessary to prevent the chaos and violence that would result from people acting in their own self-interest. Hobbes believed that without government enforcing universal laws, life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short".
Who argued that the state of nature was a vile place and that life was nasty brutish and short?
Thomas Hobbes argued that the state of nature was a vile place where life was nasty, brutish, and short in his work "Leviathan." He believed that without a strong central authority to maintain order, humans would be in a constant state of conflict and warfare.
What was Thomas hobbes view?
Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in the state of nature, life would be "nasty, brutish, and short" due to constant competition and conflict. Hobbes believed that a strong, centralized authority (such as a sovereign ruler) was necessary to maintain social order and prevent chaos.
Based on Mandate of Heaven what would happen to a ruler who did not meet his obligations to his people?
He would be replaced by a finer ruler. -APEX
What did Thomas Hobbes believe about the true nature of Humans?
Thomas Hobbes believed that humans are naturally selfish, competitive, and prone to conflict. He argued that in the absence of a strong central authority, life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short," as people would constantly be at odds with each other in a state of war.
Why did the Elizabethans believe in the need for a strong and just ruler?
Doesn't every culture want a guiding power to defend and guide them... obviously this character must be strong in the fact that a ruler must make decisions that affect many people and could get them all killed. The Elizabethans had a constant threat of assimilation from the French so a corrupt or weak ruler would cause England to become part of France.
