Helmer says that Krogstad's past actions of forgery and dishonesty have morally destroyed him. He believes that these actions have made Krogstad unfit to be around his family or to have any influence over his children.
There is no credible source or record of Fidel Castro ever saying, "I will not die until America is destroyed." This statement is likely a fabrication or misinformation.
No, it is not morally okay to steal something. Stealing goes against the principle of respecting others' property and rights, and can cause harm or distress to the victim. It is always best to find ethical and legal ways to obtain what we need or want.
Honesty is a noun. There isnt really an active verb form of honest. You cant say: I "honested". However, you can say: I was honest. In this case, honest is an adjective and was is the verb.
This claim is articulated by Michel de Montaigne, a renowned 16th-century French philosopher and essayist. Montaigne discusses the tendency of humans to attribute moral value to certain behaviors to justify them, even when they may be grounded in mere habit or convention. He argues that throughout history, what is considered morally good often aligns with what is socially habitual or customary.
Kant would argue that it is morally wrong for the murderer to lie to the person at the door, even if it means saving their own life or the life of others. According to Kant's moral philosophy, lying is always wrong, regardless of the circumstances, because it violates the principle of treating others with respect and dignity.
destroyed = zerstört destroyed = verwüstet
Kristine Linde says she had to break it off with Nils Krogstad in the past because she felt the need to prioritize her family’s well-being and financial stability over her personal desires. At that time, she believed that marrying Krogstad would not provide the security she needed, so she chose to marry someone else instead. This decision reflects her sense of duty and the societal pressures she faced as a woman during that period.
no it may be stange but i wouldnt say morally wrong.
·Morally Wrong·cruel And Inhumane ·A Violation Of The Principals Of The Constitution
Morally bankrupt (as I assume you mean) means without moral worth; for instance one might say: 'Bashar al Asad is morally bankrupt'
Not in the usual sense of that word. Some would say that he is morally disabled.
Nobody is really sure what happened to the statue, some say it was carried off to Constantinople, where it was destroyed in a fire in 475AD. Others say it was destroyed when the temple in which it sat was destroyed in 425AD.
Because it creates a very large disparities.
False
Seja forte ( Meaning spiritually, mentally, or morally strong)Or, be strong on all senses.
Depending on proximity to- say a home telephone or pay phone- I would say it would be morally incumbent upon you to do so.
There is controversy as to why the temple was destroyed. Some sources say that the Jews set fire to it, others say that the Romans set fire to it, still others say that it was destroyed by accident. The ancient writers say that Titus did not want the building destroyed, but in the fighting a fire started and grew out of control. The Christian writers claim that it was destroyed as a fulfillment of Christ's prophesy.There is controversy as to why the temple was destroyed. Some sources say that the Jews set fire to it, others say that the Romans set fire to it, still others say that it was destroyed by accident. The ancient writers say that Titus did not want the building destroyed, but in the fighting a fire started and grew out of control. The Christian writers claim that it was destroyed as a fulfillment of Christ's prophesy.There is controversy as to why the temple was destroyed. Some sources say that the Jews set fire to it, others say that the Romans set fire to it, still others say that it was destroyed by accident. The ancient writers say that Titus did not want the building destroyed, but in the fighting a fire started and grew out of control. The Christian writers claim that it was destroyed as a fulfillment of Christ's prophesy.There is controversy as to why the temple was destroyed. Some sources say that the Jews set fire to it, others say that the Romans set fire to it, still others say that it was destroyed by accident. The ancient writers say that Titus did not want the building destroyed, but in the fighting a fire started and grew out of control. The Christian writers claim that it was destroyed as a fulfillment of Christ's prophesy.There is controversy as to why the temple was destroyed. Some sources say that the Jews set fire to it, others say that the Romans set fire to it, still others say that it was destroyed by accident. The ancient writers say that Titus did not want the building destroyed, but in the fighting a fire started and grew out of control. The Christian writers claim that it was destroyed as a fulfillment of Christ's prophesy.There is controversy as to why the temple was destroyed. Some sources say that the Jews set fire to it, others say that the Romans set fire to it, still others say that it was destroyed by accident. The ancient writers say that Titus did not want the building destroyed, but in the fighting a fire started and grew out of control. The Christian writers claim that it was destroyed as a fulfillment of Christ's prophesy.There is controversy as to why the temple was destroyed. Some sources say that the Jews set fire to it, others say that the Romans set fire to it, still others say that it was destroyed by accident. The ancient writers say that Titus did not want the building destroyed, but in the fighting a fire started and grew out of control. The Christian writers claim that it was destroyed as a fulfillment of Christ's prophesy.There is controversy as to why the temple was destroyed. Some sources say that the Jews set fire to it, others say that the Romans set fire to it, still others say that it was destroyed by accident. The ancient writers say that Titus did not want the building destroyed, but in the fighting a fire started and grew out of control. The Christian writers claim that it was destroyed as a fulfillment of Christ's prophesy.There is controversy as to why the temple was destroyed. Some sources say that the Jews set fire to it, others say that the Romans set fire to it, still others say that it was destroyed by accident. The ancient writers say that Titus did not want the building destroyed, but in the fighting a fire started and grew out of control. The Christian writers claim that it was destroyed as a fulfillment of Christ's prophesy.