Essentially, irony occurs when you expect one thing and get the opposite. Because he was a well-known philosopher in ancient Athens, one might approach Socrates with the reasonable expectation that he would have some standard arguments for certain fundamental positions. Instead, he was famous for proclaiming that he knew nothing and that the only wisdom he had was the wisdom to realize how ignorant he was. Was this profession of ignorance a false front? Did he really know and simply say that he didn't know in order to get people to think for themselves (rather than simply attaching themselves to his opinions)? Different scholars read Socrates differently on this point. ----
In the Phaedo, Socratic irony is shown when Socrates pretends he does not know what Cebes and Simmias are asking, even though he does. This prompts them to engage in deeper discussion to fully understand the topic at hand. Another example is when Socrates claims to be ignorant of the true nature of the soul in order to encourage his interlocutors to explore the subject further and arrive at their own understanding through critical thinking and dialogue.
The Socratic method was proven to be useful after all
The Socratic method is contradictionism, where the philosopher deliberately contradicts popular beliefs and proves them wrong.
Socratic irony. The pretence of ignorance. He pretends not to know, and asks people questions to demonstrate their ignorance. He forces them to give an account of things and reveals their ignorance. Socratic irony is in fact doubly ironic, because he did not know the answers either. The more one knows, the more one knows one doesn't know.
The Socratic method is contradictionism, where the philosopher deliberately contradicts popular beliefs and proves them wrong.
because they can easily get into dramatic, situational, or socratic things.
Socrates. Socratic refers to Socratic seminar or Socratic method.
In the Phaedo, Socratic irony is shown when Socrates pretends he does not know what Cebes and Simmias are asking, even though he does. This prompts them to engage in deeper discussion to fully understand the topic at hand. Another example is when Socrates claims to be ignorant of the true nature of the soul in order to encourage his interlocutors to explore the subject further and arrive at their own understanding through critical thinking and dialogue.
Verbal- This is the contrast between what is said and what is meant.Dramatic- This is the contrast between what the character thinks to be true and what we know to be true.Situational- It is the contrast between what happens and what was expected.
Socratic Club ended in 1972.
Socratic Club was created in 1941.
Socratic Puzzles was created in 1997.
The Socratic method was proven to be useful after all
Socrates. This is the idea behind Socratic method.
IT is that
The Socratic method is contradictionism, where the philosopher deliberately contradicts popular beliefs and proves them wrong.
Socratic irony. The pretence of ignorance. He pretends not to know, and asks people questions to demonstrate their ignorance. He forces them to give an account of things and reveals their ignorance. Socratic irony is in fact doubly ironic, because he did not know the answers either. The more one knows, the more one knows one doesn't know.