Conventional moral standard are the standard rules of morality that we just take it from our grandparents and we don't have any right to quibble on it, so these rules we just have to accept it as it is without changing anything in it as we don't have the right to do so. Moreover, these rules are like our customs and traditions so we just apply it as it is and it relates to our heritage society.
On the other hand, reflective moral standards are those standards that we can criticize on it by relating ourselves to the situation and then we can agree or disagree if it is moral or immoral standard. So they are not basics which we forced to commit ourselves with it as we have the chance of trying whether we found it moral or not. Furthermore, this type of moral standard includes the steps on analyzing, approaching, and understanding the statement. As by discussing the idea we can know the reason of being moral or immoral statement.
By other words, in conventional we don't have the permission to criticize or even think of agreeing about a statement and disagreeing because it is a moral standard that we inherited from our ancestors. On the other hand, the opposite side is reflective moral standards that we receive it and consider ourselves in the same situation and then we can criticize on it. In addition, an example about reflective moral standard is that if a company produced a unique product and warned about coping its product and say that all rights reserved. Other company may decide to make similar product and sold it with less cost and they think that they are not doing wrong things and that is their rights. So here the reflective moral standards comes to its place , so if the second company puts its self in the first company place and see what will it feel about that. Off course it won't be happy and satisfied about this as in this way it will lose its work because the other company is stilling its product and selling it with less cost which will make most customers buy from that and all its working and time will go with no benefits.
In brief, conventional and reflective are types of moral standards which mean different things as conventional are standard that we can't argue on it while reflective moral standards are those standards that we can argue on it and reflected to ourselves to see whether it is good or bad.
In "Morality as Anti-Nature," Nietzsche critiques traditional morality for going against our natural instincts and desires. He argues that morality restricts our potential for personal growth and authenticity by imposing rigid rules and values that suppress our natural inclinations. Nietzsche advocates for a reevaluation of morality to prioritize individual flourishing and self-expression over conformity to societal norms.
There is no difference between ethics and positive morality. The two of them are interrelated and have to be applied collectively. You cannot have ethics and lack positive morality and vice versa.
Slave morality and master morality are two contrasting ethical systems proposed by philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. Slave morality is characterized by values such as humility, compassion, and meekness, which are typically associated with the oppressed or disadvantaged. In contrast, master morality is based on values like strength, power, and dominance, often embraced by those in positions of authority or privilege. The key distinction lies in the source of moral values and the perspective from which they are viewed.
Objective morality refers to moral rules or principles that are universal and independent of personal beliefs or opinions. Subjective morality, on the other hand, is based on personal feelings, beliefs, or opinions and can vary from one person to another. Objective morality tends to be fixed and unchanging, while subjective morality may be more flexible and open to interpretation.
Master morality and slave morality are two contrasting ethical systems proposed by Friedrich Nietzsche. Master morality is based on values such as strength, power, and nobility, where individuals define good and evil based on their own terms. In contrast, slave morality is rooted in values like humility, compassion, and meekness, where good and evil are determined by the oppressed or weak in response to the actions of the powerful. The key difference lies in the source of moral values and the perspective from which they are defined.
Reflective morality is the internalized version of right and wrong from the elements of our upbringing. Reflective morality can include both religious morality, customary morality, and empathy.
It isn't necessarily an improvement at all, actually, but it is useful, especially historically, to judge someone's actions with the context of what was normal in the context of their generation and their society, rather than looking back and judging them based on the norms of our own more modern world.
Customary morality refers to the set of ethical norms and values that are widely accepted and practiced within a particular culture or society. It is often derived from tradition, social customs, and collective experiences, influencing how individuals distinguish right from wrong. Unlike formal legal systems, customary morality is not codified but is maintained through social interactions and communal reinforcement. This form of morality can vary significantly between different cultures and may evolve over time as societal values change.
The "new morality" was a set of ideas of groups that wanted to restrict immigration and preserve, what they considered "traditional values." New Morality challenged traditional ways of seeing and thinking, it glorified youth and personal freedom and influenced various aspects of Americain society.
Nietzsche described master Morality is some kind of honor, creator of values, art, nobility...while slave Morality is friendship, and compassion. Slave morality speaks against power believes it to a negative. For Nietzsche, master morality is detrimental to freedom.
moral is something right or wrong morality is how long you live, we are all mortal because we all die someday
Traditional beliefs are those beliefs that govern ethics and morality within any long standing religion or belief system.
sentimental novel
Roger Scruton's view that traditional sexual morality helps eliminate jealousy is based on the idea that clear boundaries and commitments within monogamous relationships reduce opportunities for jealousy to arise. By promoting fidelity and loyalty, traditional sexual morality aims to foster trust and security within relationships. Scruton argues that these values contribute to stable and harmonious partnerships, leading to personal fulfillment and societal cohesion.
What is the difference between "morals" and "morality"? I think these are just two sides of the same moral phenomenon. Morals are the social side and morality is the individual side of the same. Morals mean for me the moral norms and moral principles of the common sense and/or accepted by the members of a social community. Morality means the personal moral values and principles which conduct really my behaviour.
A+Ls** it focuses on traditional values of family,religion and morality.
A+Ls** it focuses on traditional values of family,religion and morality.