You can't always have peace by being peaceful, sometimes you have to fight a war to obtain peace, because no matter how peaceful you may be, you can still be invaded by some other less peaceful country. War is the opposite of peace, so it is paradoxical that you might have to use war to obtain peace. No matter how much you dislike war, even if you think it is absolutely the worst possible thing, you may still have to fight one.
World War One was described at the time as "the war to end all wars" although this tragically proved to be quite wrong. We try to create peace by defeating the people who want war, yet even when we do so, there always seems to be a new reason for war. So, we can observe that even though we sometimes have to go to war in order to have peace, that is not a complete solution. We need a more evolved form of human civilization, in order to have a lasting peace. But we may have to go to war, on the way to achieving that objective. And in the nuclear age, war is more dangerous than ever before. It is possible that we may someday have a war that is so destructive that it will finally result in the peace of the grave, for everyone. That too will be a paradoxical outcome, a war that everybody loses.
It is difficult to determine how far a country should go in making concessions to achieve peace. Peace is important for the citizens in any country, and many citizens who are living in war torn areas may think that a country should go as far as necessary to achieve peace. Even going so far as entering into a war to gain peace for the country.
This thought means that true peace comes when you focus on the actions themselves rather than getting caught up in the expected outcomes or results. By letting go of attachment to specific outcomes, you can find contentment in the process of your actions and experience a greater sense of inner peace.
Making peace with other countries can help promote stability, security, and prosperity for all involved. It can also lead to improved diplomatic relations, increased opportunities for trade and collaboration, and a reduction in conflicts and tensions. Ultimately, prioritizing peace with other countries can contribute to a more peaceful and interconnected world.
no, what is peace when there is war? I believe that war is out of greediness and pettiness and war should not have happened at all. Historically, enemies can become friends, following a war. For example, in WW II, the US fought against what were then known as the Axis powers, Germany, Japan, and Italy. This was an extremely bitter war, with tremendous violence and hatred and millions of deaths. The US even used the atomic bomb against Japan, which so far is the only time in history that the atomic bomb has been used in war. However, following WW II, the US became very good friends with all three of its former enemies, and no new hostilities are expected. I could also point out that the most bitter conflict of all, during WW II, was between Germany and France, and yet now these two countries are both members of the European Union and are very close friends who, we can reasonably predict, will never again have reason to go to war with each other. So yes, peace can be attained after war. It is not impossible.
Saying no would imply that the answer is yes, and so that would imply the answer is no. And that would go on forever.It is like saying "this sentence is false."by stating the sentence you are saying it is true.
One who loves peace and is willing to fight for it. “I am not only a pacifist but a militant pacifist. I am willing to fight for peace. Nothing will end war unless the people themselves refuse to go to war." Albert Einstein
the peace party did not want to go to war with Mexico they wanted to stay loyal to them however the war party wanted freedom from Mexico hence "war" and "peace"
No. He wants peace.
you go eat some cheese
Literally it means "With Peace," Ma meaning "with" and Salam meaning "Peace." It is commonly used as a Farewell or Goodbye, as in "Go in peace." It can be shortened colloquially to just "salam" or stated more formally as "Masalama."
They were cannibals, which probably frightened their enemies away. They were also very violent; having a war-time government and a peace-time government, meaning that they were very prepared to go to war.
To see if Martin Luther King was there to give me peace.
He went to Paris to represent the US at the Peace Conference.
They will take prefernces over peace but will go to war in an exteme circumtances to prevail justice
yes,they were they had to go with there fathers and help the country to survive and live in peace.
Please go in peace. Go in peace, but go now...
THE TRUTHthe hawks were people in the war that wanted war to go on.On the other side was the doves they wanted the war to end the did not want this war because it was killing there people.___-