His conclusion or moral to this was that hidden crimes always come to light.
The moral lesson that can be gotten from the anecdote is to take heed of the wisdom spoken by the wise and experienced.The moral lesson of Jose Rizal is that it is one's right to have love for their country and to fight for it. Jose Rizal's life showed that there is a way to have a larger impact on the world with having an attitude of willingness to act in a way to support one's beliefs. Jose Rizal believed in the bravery of soldiers to display the love of one's country with the greatest display of love by fighting even until death for their country and loved one's.
Descriptive relativism examines, through factual accounts, a plethora of conflicting values without attempting to reach a definitive conclusion on morality. For example a descriptive relativist might research the practice of cannibalism to the accepted abhorrence of it in certain cultures. The relativist accepts that no factual account of peoples differing moral views will lead to a definitive moral conclusion, the relavtivist might adopt a personal viewpoint in the process though. For example that certain moral values are primitive compared to others and that we should therefore encourage the former in advancing their moral standard or that there are a wide variety of moral values and that there are no absolute values. In contrast to this Normative relativism advocates that that different moral outlooks are appropriate in their own time. Moral values here a considered as cultural prefrences. In the same way that a cultures food and nutrition is developed according to the surroundings and resources, so are moral values. However normative realism leads to unfavourable conclusions such as the non existence of moral progression, a case of genetic fallacy and a plethora of assumptions such as the unified and uniform moral opinions of every individual in a society at a given time. So the distinction between normative and descriptive relativism is that normative realism provides one conclusion which although difinative, presents it with multiple issues. Descriptive relativism doenst prescribe any particular conclusion but leaves morality as an open question.
The first premise is a statement of moral preference. The second premise is a statement that that moral preference is applicable to the present case. Then the conclusion is drawn. For example: (1) One should never murder another human being, (2) If I were to kill this person, I would be murdering another human being; hence, I ought not kill this person. .
in my mind, i think moral is more important. you see, we can make money when we lost it. however, can you image what happen to ourselves and our city when we lost our moral? can you find it again? anyway, if you want to be a good man, the first rule you must obey is following moral. so i think moral is more important.
To draw a conclusion about a character, one should consider their actions, motivations, and relationships within the narrative. For instance, if a character consistently makes selfless choices that positively impact others, it may suggest they possess a strong moral compass or inherent kindness. Conversely, if they frequently act out of selfishness or malice, it could indicate deeper flaws or unresolved issues. Ultimately, a comprehensive understanding of their development throughout the story is essential for a well-rounded conclusion.
if i didn't remember it wrong, its a wrong to start an essay by giving a short story.
The message is in the story.
never jump to conclusion
The moral lesson that can be gotten from the anecdote is to take heed of the wisdom spoken by the wise and experienced.The moral lesson of Jose Rizal is that it is one's right to have love for their country and to fight for it. Jose Rizal's life showed that there is a way to have a larger impact on the world with having an attitude of willingness to act in a way to support one's beliefs. Jose Rizal believed in the bravery of soldiers to display the love of one's country with the greatest display of love by fighting even until death for their country and loved one's.
The lesson in a story is called the moral.
Exemplum means two things:1. An example. 2. A brief story used to make a point in an argument or to illustrate a moral truth.Pronounced: Ex-em-pla
Paine's anecdote about the Tory serves to illustrate the dangers of complacency and the consequences of inaction in the face of tyranny. It highlights the moral failure of those who prioritize personal comfort over the collective struggle for freedom. By showcasing the Tory's cowardice and self-serving attitude, Paine aims to galvanize his readers to take a stand against oppression and advocate for independence. This anecdote reinforces the urgency of the revolutionary cause and the need for active participation in the fight for liberty.
A moral argument typically consists of a premise establishing a moral principle or value, followed by a premise identifying a particular situation or action, and a conclusion that applies the moral principle to the situation to assess its moral status. This structure aims to demonstrate why a certain action is right or wrong based on ethical principles.
the story contains a moral. (APEX)
first you have to have a topic then you have to write an introduction so people know what you are going to write about after that you can write as many paragraphs as you want ........... and don't forget to add a conclusion aka the moral or statement to wrap up your point. good luck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Parable
Descriptive relativism examines, through factual accounts, a plethora of conflicting values without attempting to reach a definitive conclusion on morality. For example a descriptive relativist might research the practice of cannibalism to the accepted abhorrence of it in certain cultures. The relativist accepts that no factual account of peoples differing moral views will lead to a definitive moral conclusion, the relavtivist might adopt a personal viewpoint in the process though. For example that certain moral values are primitive compared to others and that we should therefore encourage the former in advancing their moral standard or that there are a wide variety of moral values and that there are no absolute values. In contrast to this Normative relativism advocates that that different moral outlooks are appropriate in their own time. Moral values here a considered as cultural prefrences. In the same way that a cultures food and nutrition is developed according to the surroundings and resources, so are moral values. However normative realism leads to unfavourable conclusions such as the non existence of moral progression, a case of genetic fallacy and a plethora of assumptions such as the unified and uniform moral opinions of every individual in a society at a given time. So the distinction between normative and descriptive relativism is that normative realism provides one conclusion which although difinative, presents it with multiple issues. Descriptive relativism doenst prescribe any particular conclusion but leaves morality as an open question.