include expert testimony
Join words are words that connect different parts of a sentence, such as "and," "but," or "because." Joining ideas involves linking related concepts or arguments together to create a cohesive narrative or argument. This can help improve the flow and organization of writing.
There is no direct scientific evidence linking caffeine consumption to the development of cellulite. Cellulite is primarily caused by genetics, hormones, and lifestyle factors, rather than caffeine intake.
Static linking involves linking libraries during compile time, resulting in a standalone executable file that includes all necessary libraries. Dynamic linking occurs at run time, where executable files use shared libraries stored separately on the system. Static linking produces larger executable files, while dynamic linking allows for easier updates and maintenance of shared libraries.
There is no direct scientific evidence linking well water to causing eczema in individuals who are regularly exposed to it. Eczema is a complex condition with various triggers, and more research is needed to determine if well water can contribute to its development.
Teeth grinding during sleep, known as bruxism, can be caused by stress, anxiety, or misaligned teeth. There is no scientific evidence linking teeth grinding to the presence of worms in the body. It is important to consult a dentist or healthcare provider for proper diagnosis and treatment.
The best strategy for linking evidence to your ideas in an argument is to clearly introduce the evidence, provide context for the reader to understand its relevance, analyze how it supports your ideas, and explain the impact of the evidence on your overall argument. It's important to seamlessly integrate the evidence into your writing, using transitions and citations to connect it back to your ideas effectively.
There seems to be no evidence linking the two together.By linking the wires, we complete the circuit.
A debate needs to have a warrant to provide logical justification for claims made during the discussion. The warrant connects evidence to the argument, explaining why the evidence supports the claim. It helps establish the credibility of the argument by linking it to established facts, principles, or reasoning, thereby enhancing its persuasiveness. Without a warrant, arguments may appear weak or unsupported, undermining the overall effectiveness of the debate.
The linking verb "is."
Argument discourse is a form of communication where participants present and defend their viewpoints on a specific issue. This type of discourse aims to persuade others or achieve a deeper understanding of the topic through logical reasoning and evidence. Key Elements of Argument Discourse In argument discourse, participants put forward their main claims, supported by evidence such as facts, data, examples, or expert opinions. Logical reasoning is crucial for linking the evidence to the allegations. Participants also address counterarguments to reinforce their position or demonstrate why their claim remains valid despite opposing views. Purpose and Significance of Argument Discourse The primary purpose of argument discourse is either to persuade others of one's stance or to explore various perspectives on an issue collaboratively. Unlike conflicts or arguments, this type of discourse focuses on rational dialogue and mutual respect, even in the face of disagreement.
Linking verbs are words that link the subject to the predicate to form a complete sentence. A sentence example with a linking verb is the following: The apple pie looked tasty or the shoes feel comfortable. The term unusually is recognized as a linking verb if used in a sentence such as the following: the temperature in Boston is unusually hot during this time of year.
In this sentence, "was" is a linking verb. Linking verbs connect the subject of a sentence with a subject complement that renames or describes it, in this case "expecting a package in the mail."
The evidence that the suspect was at the scene of the crime includes eyewitness accounts, surveillance footage placing them at the location, and forensic evidence such as fingerprints or DNA linking them to the scene.
I will shred the sensitive documents I no longer need.There was not a shred of evidence linking him to the crime.
Yes, the sentence is correct.The pronoun 'they' is a subjective personal pronoun. In the example sentence, the pronoun 'they' is functioning as a subject complement following a linking verb (It = they). A pronoun that follows a linking verb is always the subjective form.A linking verb acts as an equals sign, the object is a form of the subject (Mary is my sister. Mary=sister); or the subject becomes the object (Mary's feet got wet. feet->wet).A subject complement takes the place of a direct object following a linking verb and restates the subject of the sentence.The subject complements are:a predicate nominative is a noun or a pronoun following a linking verb;a predicate adjective is an adjective following a linking verb.
She is beautiful.They are colorful.The adjective following a linking verb is called a predicate adjective (a type of subject complement).
DNA evidence found at a crime scene can help solve a criminal investigation by linking the suspect to the scene of the crime.