Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently selfish and needed a strong central authority to maintain order, while John Locke believed in the idea of natural rights and the consent of the governed as the basis for a just government. Both philosophers influenced modern political thought on the nature of government and individual rights.
Locke and Hobbes were both influential political philosophers, but they had different views on the nature of government and human rights. Hobbes believed that people were inherently selfish and needed a strong central authority to maintain order, while Locke argued that individuals had natural rights and that government should protect these rights. In summary, Hobbes emphasized the need for a powerful government to control human behavior, while Locke emphasized the importance of individual rights and limited government power.
Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently selfish and driven by self-preservation. He argued that in order to avoid chaos and conflict, individuals needed to submit to a strong central authority, or government, that could maintain order and protect their interests.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both influential political philosophers, but they had different views on the nature of government and human nature. Hobbes believed that people were inherently selfish and needed a strong central authority to maintain order, while Locke argued that individuals had natural rights and that government should protect these rights. In summary, Hobbes favored a more authoritarian approach to governance, while Locke advocated for a more democratic and individualistic system.
Thomas Hobbes believed that people are inherently selfish and driven by self-interest, while John Locke believed that people are inherently rational and guided by natural rights to life, liberty, and property.
Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently selfish and needed a strong central authority to maintain order, while John Locke believed in the idea of natural rights and the consent of the governed as the basis for a just government. Both philosophers influenced modern political thought on the nature of government and individual rights.
People.
they get it from the people/citizens. they get it from the people/citizens.
Locke and Hobbes were both influential political philosophers, but they had different views on the nature of government and human rights. Hobbes believed that people were inherently selfish and needed a strong central authority to maintain order, while Locke argued that individuals had natural rights and that government should protect these rights. In summary, Hobbes emphasized the need for a powerful government to control human behavior, while Locke emphasized the importance of individual rights and limited government power.
i don't know what you mean by 'type'. Enlightenment philosophers basically wanted their individual freedom and also, Charles Montesquieu believed that the true freedom required laws, which means the philosophers basically wanted a government. By overthrowing the monarchs, and all of other things and such, government was created. what type of government, hm . A government who gives people a right to vote and such? who gives people freedom and who is isn't a monarch.
Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently selfish and driven by self-preservation. He argued that in order to avoid chaos and conflict, individuals needed to submit to a strong central authority, or government, that could maintain order and protect their interests.
Thomas Hobbes believed that the purpose of government was to protect people from their evil ways or own selfishness.
Not all people are selfish and/or greedy.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both influential political philosophers, but they had different views on the nature of government and human nature. Hobbes believed that people were inherently selfish and needed a strong central authority to maintain order, while Locke argued that individuals had natural rights and that government should protect these rights. In summary, Hobbes favored a more authoritarian approach to governance, while Locke advocated for a more democratic and individualistic system.
What a selfish thing to say!
Thomas Hobbes believed that people are inherently selfish and driven by self-interest, while John Locke believed that people are inherently rational and guided by natural rights to life, liberty, and property.
The government of North Korea is a dictatorship that doesn’t care for it’s people and uses them for their selfish reasons.