0
What else can I help you with?
What does cole argue with at the circle in Touching Spirit Bear?
Cole argues with the Spirit Bear at the circle. He sees the bear as a reflection of himself and his inner struggles, leading to a confrontation that eventually helps him confront his own inner demons. Ultimately, the encounter with the bear serves as a turning point in Cole's healing journey.
On what grounds do the women of Augusta county argue for an end to slavery?
The women of Augusta county argue for an end to slavery based on moral and ethical principles, emphasizing the inherent humanity and dignity of all individuals regardless of race. They also stress the importance of justice and equality for all, highlighting the injustices and hardships faced by enslaved individuals. Additionally, they may argue for economic and social benefits that could result from ending slavery.
Would John Rawls argue that it is unjust to give some people more opportunity than others?
Yes, John Rawls would argue that it is unjust to give some people more opportunity than others. He believed in the principle of justice as fairness, which requires that inequalities in wealth and opportunity should only be permitted if they benefit the least advantaged members of society. Unequal opportunities that systematically disadvantage certain groups would violate Rawls' concept of justice.
Do people believe there are no absolute truth and justice?
Depends on who you ask. Most people; regrettably, are religious, so they think god is the standard for absolute truth and justice. Others think there is no such thing and we're just reacting to other people.
How did Socrates view of the good true and justice disagree with that of the Sophists?
Socrates believed that the good, true, and justice were objective values that existed independently of individual opinions, and could be discovered through rational inquiry and dialogue. In contrast, the Sophists believed that these values were subjective and could vary from person to person, and they often used rhetoric and persuasion to argue their point of view, rather than seeking ultimate truth.
Who does cole argue with at the circle tuching spirit bear?
Mr.wafflecock
What does cole argue with at the circle in Touching Spirit Bear?
Cole argues with the Spirit Bear at the circle. He sees the bear as a reflection of himself and his inner struggles, leading to a confrontation that eventually helps him confront his own inner demons. Ultimately, the encounter with the bear serves as a turning point in Cole's healing journey.
Who does cole argue at the circle?
In "Touching Spirit Bear" by Ben Mikaelsen, Cole Matthews argues against the other members of the Circle Justice, including Garvey and the elders, who advocate for his accountability and healing. He initially resists their perspectives, trying to justify his past actions and deflect responsibility. Ultimately, the Circle aims to help him confront the consequences of his behavior and find a path to redemption. Cole's journey throughout the circle reflects his struggle to understand the importance of community and personal growth.
Who does Cole argue with in the circle?
cole aruges with his dad
What are negatives about circle justice?
Circle justice, which focuses on restorative practices and community involvement in the justice process, can have drawbacks. Critics argue that it may lack the deterrent effect of traditional punitive measures, potentially leading to repeat offenses. Additionally, the approach relies heavily on community participation and may not be effective in all cultural contexts or situations, potentially resulting in inconsistent outcomes. Finally, there can be challenges in ensuring that all voices are heard and that power dynamics do not influence the process unfairly.
Is your cat your dads spirit?
It all depends entirely on belief and religion etc.Some will argue it is impossible, others will say it is definite.
What shape is round?
Usually a circle. Some might argue that some solid figures such as spheres and cylinders are also round.
Why does the Associate Press object to closing courtrooms?
Journalists often object when courtrooms are closed because they argue that only if all the facts and occurences of a case occur in public can justice be seen to be done. Journalists argue against keeping court cases secret because they say it is in the interests of justice that people can see what happens in the court.
Which shape has all angles less than 90 degrees?
A non-right triangle. You might be able to argue a circle, if you get inventive. :).
How many sides and corners does the shape circle have?
A circle has no corners. In general "Side" is a term that is reserved for polygons; a polygon is a simple closed piecewise-linear curve in the plane with finitely many linear pieces and the number of sides of a polygon is the number of linear pieces. For a circle - as far as how many side it has - the answer depends on the definition of the word "side." There are valid arguments (depending of how "side" is defined) for 0, 1, 2, and ∞. Since it has no flat edges you could argue for 0. You could think of it as having 1 continuously curved side A circle only has "inside", an "outside" and the set of points that define the circle so you could argue for 2. You can draw infinitely many tangents to it - so you could argue ∞
WHAT ARE THE VERTICES OF A CIRCLE?
Depending on how you want to define vertices, a circle either has no vertices or the circle is composed of infinite vertices. A vertex is where two straight edges meet. Since a circle is continuously curved you can easily argue that it has no straight edges to meet and form a vertex. From a limits standpoint though it has infinitely many straight segments - but they are are all of length 1/∞
If a Supreme Court justice were to argue using a precedent what might be or she do?
If a Supreme Court justice were to argue using a precedent, they would reference a previous ruling that addresses similar legal questions or issues. This involves analyzing the facts, legal principles, and reasoning of the earlier case to support their argument or decision. The justice might highlight how the precedent aligns with the current case's circumstances, demonstrating its relevance and the need for consistency in the law. Ultimately, this approach reinforces the doctrine of stare decisis, which promotes stability and predictability in the legal system.
