answersLogoWhite

0

If a Supreme Court justice were to argue using a precedent, they would reference a previous ruling that addresses similar legal questions or issues. This involves analyzing the facts, legal principles, and reasoning of the earlier case to support their argument or decision. The justice might highlight how the precedent aligns with the current case's circumstances, demonstrating its relevance and the need for consistency in the law. Ultimately, this approach reinforces the doctrine of stare decisis, which promotes stability and predictability in the legal system.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

If supreme court justice were to argue using a precedent what might he or she do?

Site other cases that came to similar conclusions


What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case?

That Scott had no right to argue in court


Is the Attorney General in the US Supreme Court?

No. The U.S. Attorney General is head of the Department of Justice and the top law enforcement officer for the United States, but does not typically argue before the Supreme Court, except under special circumstances. The current Attorney General is Eric Holder. The U.S. Solicitor General (and staff attorneys), who is also a member of the Department of Justice, represents the government before the Supreme Court. The Solicitor General, while not a true member of the Court, is sometimes called "the tenth Justice."


Why do some argue that the supreme court actually makes law?

Because the supreme court decides weather or not a new law (a bill at the time) is constitutional or not. they make the final choice


Why would a defense lawyer argue about which case should be used for precedent?

Precedent reflects past cases that have been decided on, usually by the Federal or State Supreme Courts, whose decisions reflect some similarity to the defenses case. Based on the decision made the defense attorney can argue that the same decision applies to his/her case.


Which president sign a bill allowing female attorneys to argue cases before the supreme court?

Borack obama


Which president signed a bill allowing female attorneys to argue a case in the supreme court?

Ruther B. hayes


Which president signed a bill allowing female attorney to argue cases before Supreme Court?

Borack obama


What is a superem court?

he is a person you hope had a good morning and did not argue with his wife.when you are facing charges and he is your judge.


What president signed a bill allowing female attourneys to argue cases before the Supreme Court?

Rutherford B. Hayes


Why does the Associate Press object to closing courtrooms?

Journalists often object when courtrooms are closed because they argue that only if all the facts and occurences of a case occur in public can justice be seen to be done. Journalists argue against keeping court cases secret because they say it is in the interests of justice that people can see what happens in the court.


In what year did attorney Thurgood Marshall argue and win Brown v. Board of Education in the US Supreme Court?

Lead Counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and future US Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall's best-known case as a lawyer may have been Brown v. Board of Education, (1954), which he argued before the Court twice - in 1952 and 1953.For more information on Brown v. Board of Education, see Related Links, below.