Leibniz asked the question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" because he was curious about the existence of the universe and sought to understand the fundamental reasons behind its existence.
There is no concrete evidence that supports the claim that nothing exists. The absence of evidence for the existence of something does not prove that nothing exists. The concept of nothingness is often philosophical and abstract, rather than something that can be proven empirically.
In "A Separate Peace," a rhetorical question is a question asked for effect or to make a point rather than to elicit an answer. For example, when Gene asks, "Do you really think they'd let him in the Army if there was something really wrong with him?" he is not seeking a response but trying to challenge Finny's belief.
There is no universally accepted mathematical proof for the existence of God. The question of God's existence is a matter of faith and belief, rather than something that can be proven through mathematical equations.
A question that has no answer is called a rhetorical question. It is typically used for persuasive or dramatic effect rather than to elicit a response.
Yes, it is a rhetorical question, which is a question that is asked to make a point or to create an effect rather than to elicit an actual answer.
There is something rather than nothing because the state of nothing is UNSTABLE. But that gives the state of nothing a property - instability. You might argue that absolutely nothing has no time dimension and therefore stability is irrelevant. Time has to pass if there is a change of state. Without time, there cannot be change and therefore instability is impossible.
There is no concrete evidence that supports the claim that nothing exists. The absence of evidence for the existence of something does not prove that nothing exists. The concept of nothingness is often philosophical and abstract, rather than something that can be proven empirically.
Both had been working on similar ideas - on calculus - and Newton, who was considered by some contemporaries to be rather an arrogant man, was not amused to see someone else steal his thunder!
How do you know there are things rather than nothing?That's the answer.
J.M. Barrie, author of Peter Pan
This is a difficult . For instance, " There wasn't anything that we could do" rather than "There was nothing that we could do" Nothing smacks of negative thoughts whereas anything suggest s that this had been thought out. Something means to me anyway, that it is important . e.g " I knew that there was something going on" Hope that makes sense.
The phrase 'ain't nothing' is incorrect grammar. First, 'ain't' is not a word. Second, the contraction includes 'not' so it creates a double negative, meaning, 'not nothing'. Ex: It was not (wasn't) nothing. That example makes little sense! Better grammar would be to switch the sentence to positive phrasing, e.g. to 'something' rather than 'nothing'. Example: His answer was really something! He was clear, concise, and intelligent. Better yet, leave out 'nothing' or 'something' and simply state what you mean! Example: His answer was clear, concise, and intelligent.
The question could refer to either 0.7272... or to 0.7222... and there is nothing in the question to suggest that it should be one rather than the other.
To write a good question the answer to the question can't be a yes or no answer or something simple like that. A good question would be: "What was your opinion of the character in...... movie?" The question must not be to broad either. This question will get a good response rather than. "how was the movie?" is too vague.
Your question sounds like a statement, rather than a question. And that's probably the way it really is. If she doesn't love you, there is nothing you can do about it. You should find someone that loves you because love is what you and everyone deserves.
I (the person answering this) have 5 fish but are going to be giving them away soon. This question is rather dome because its random people answering this. Please ask something that means something.
There is nothing called cheating. We make a template of situation, person or our own selves and if something does not fit into that sooner or later or rather never, then we terms it as cheating.