0
Simply because it is more beneficial for themselves. People don't care much about being 'good' because by design a person is selfish. You must remember that a human is still an animal, and animals like to take the shortest, easiest, and best route to being successful. That means usually being evil. Of course, most people have ethics that stop them from turning completely evil from their point of view. Then there is of course the question of what *is* 'good' and 'evil', but all I am going to say about that is that it differs for every person on earth, and there is nothing that is universally viewed as 'good'.
What else can I help you with?
Who said all it takes for evil to win is for enough good men to do nothing?
Edmund Burke. The actual quote is: "The only thing necessary for the triumph [of evil] is for good men to do nothing."Addendum:The "actual quote" cannot be found. While it is attributed to Burke, there is not evidence that he ever actually spoke or wrote it, and Burke was a prolific writer and speaker.There have been countless attempts to tie it to a specific piece of writing, and some of these are laudable. One of the most likely sources of this particular bit of wisdom could be: When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle. It was born in Burke's speech of 23 April 1770, "Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents," delivered to the House of Commons.The quote as it is in the question appears in at least eleven different permutations on the internet:The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.All that is needed for the forces of evil to triumph is for enough good men to do nothing.All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.In order for 'evil' to prevail, all that need happen is for 'good' people to do nothing.All that is needed for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.The surest way for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.All it will take for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing.All that is necessary for the forces of evil to take root in the world is for enough good men to do nothing.All that is needed for the forces of evil to succeed is for enough good men to remain silent.All it takes for Evil to prevail in this world is for enough good men to do nothing.The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.These more commonly worded permutations of Burke's message survive, perhaps more because they appeal to the modern ear. Call it poetic license, but Burke's words live on, they just look a little different.
Is a man born good or evil?
Man is born innately good in his weakness but with time develops a evil hate in that weakness with the strength of others between emotional and rationality.With rationality and virtues in good upbringings people learn to think themselves as part of a greater whole and acting for oneself without consideration of others is wrong or evil. In bad upbringings people come to see themselves as individuals and will seek to better themselves no matter the cost to other people. These people are also more likely to take pleasure in harming other living beings. this evil is a temporary madness and those with a lack of guilt will seek to do so again and feel no remorse. The capability for evil is within as one can work as individual beings which was needed for survival tens of thousands of years ago. The capability for good comes from ones instincts as social or group animals which come from antiquity and far back from our ancestors.
Why do evil acts mostly succeed than the good ones?
Evil acts may seem to succeed more often because they are often driven by selfish motives and a willingness to do whatever it takes to achieve a goal. Good acts, on the other hand, often require more time, effort, and collaboration to be successful. Additionally, evil acts may exploit loopholes or take advantage of others, making them appear to have initial success.
What does Gandhi's quote I object to violence because when it appears to do good the good is only temporary the evil it does is permanent mean?
This quote by Gandhi conveys his belief that resorting to violence may seem to bring about short-term benefits, but its negative consequences are lasting. He argues that even if violence seems to achieve an immediate good, it ultimately perpetuates a cycle of harm and suffering that is more enduring. Gandhi believed in nonviolent resistance as a more sustainable and morally just approach to creating lasting change.
In the context of apologetics groothius thinks that it is sufficient to offer a defense against the problem of evil rather than offer a theodicy?
Groothius argues that offering a defense against the problem of evil is more feasible than constructing a theodicy, as theodicies aim to provide a comprehensive explanation for why evil exists. Groothius believes that a defense can demonstrate that belief in God is reasonable despite the existence of evil, without needing to fully justify or explain the presence of evil in the world.
Why good people suffer and evil people prosper?
Because good people have limits to what they can do(as in to not hurt others) while evil people have no restraints on what they can and cannot do, allowing them much more freedom to get what they want, and thus hurt others (as in good people).
Is good a more powerful force than evil in the modern world?
It's subjective and situational. Both good and evil exist in the world, but the perception of their power varies based on individual beliefs, actions, and circumstances. Ultimately, the balance between good and evil is a complex interplay that shapes the world we live in.
Was hitlor a good person?
You will find Hitler in amost every list of 'most evil' people, though some may consider him more misguided and manipulated than evil, 'good' is not how one can describe him.
What are the views of good and evil in an eastern culture?
Evil is seen more as imperfection and mistakes, rather than from a source of evil. Evil is more of an absence of good rather than its own entity; it is the product of deluded thinking.
Which is stronger good or evil?
It is more fun to be evil put the main probelm of being evil is that people find you less atractive and do not like you so they will not follow you (wich prevents being able to sacrafice them)
Where there is good there is evil?
Good and evil are often seen as two opposing forces that exist in balance. The presence of good can make us more aware of evil, just as the presence of evil can highlight the importance of good. The concept of good and evil is subjective and can vary depending on cultural and individual beliefs.
In adventure quest worlds what should you pick good or evil?
LONG UN-LIVE THE SHADOWSYTCE evil has more weapons evil has cooler weapons evil has more awosome amour
How did evil get into the world?
Once sentience is achieved human kind has always sought after more than their meager existence allowed, greed for material wealth and by extension power. Evil is in this world because some men forsake their humanity and become monsters, all for the sake of wealth and power. There are also lesser evils, like murderers and thieves, these people often have mental illnesses, were abused as a child or had some sort of traumatic experience, either that or they were simply born in an environment that promotes evil. Evil births evil, as does good births good.
Are protestants evil?
That is like asking "are people evil?" - it depends on your definition of "evil." All people have some capacity for good and evil, and protestants are no different. Protestants are a huge group and can't be taken as a unit. There are certainly people who are Protestant who are evil (most, if not all, high-level Nazis were Protestant, and most people would agree they were evil). But Protestants as a group are no more evil than any other group of people. Some Catholics believe Protestants are evil, because Protestants by definition are "protesting" the Roman Catholic Church's claim to sole authority over the church. But most Catholics, if they get to know some Protestants, realize that Protestants are no more less evil than anyone else.
Are people who don't believe in Christ more evil?
No.
Is there more good than evil?
There would not be good without evil. Try to keep in mind that good and evil are only the words we use to describe how we perceive something. An action that one person might consider to be evil, another might think to be good. Anything that is not physical dose not 'have to be' anything.I suppose the answer would be No, but there is more to it when you think about it. Hope this helped.
What is the moral lesson in Cinderella story?
you should treat people the way you would like to be treated and then more good comes out of it than evil.
