Evil acts give attention.
It seems to me the moral distinction or demarcation of human acts such as right and wrong, good and bad, must be determined by the views and opinions of the majority at different time and place, taken into account of its prevailing political system and religion as well as its cultural traditions.
The opposite of evil is good, or benevolent.
The concept of good and evil can be subjective, as different people and cultures may have varying beliefs about what is considered good or evil based on their values, beliefs, and experiences.
The central debate in the good vs. evil philosophy revolves around whether humans are inherently good or evil, and how this impacts their actions and behavior.
The concept of good and evil is subjective and varies among different cultures and individuals. Some argue that humans have an inherent sense of morality, while others believe that good and evil are learned behaviors influenced by society and environment. Ultimately, the presence of good and evil in human nature is a complex topic with no definitive answer.
Mostly good but some evil as punishment.
adam and eve are not responsible for evil acts committed by their offspring, they only introduced evil to the human bloodline by eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
Not at all.It is impossible. if it is true that a n evil act has good consequence there is no evil act exists.An evil act will always consequence a bad and evil end.
n00b
Under every evil is good and under every good is evil. so if your little sister acts unusually nice to you then she might have a bad reason under that and vice versa.
Boondock Saints reference....
Depends on the way a person acts. One's thoughts and actions make the person good or makes the person evil.
Because you do not have red eyes. In all seriousness, good and evil are often hard to define without guidance. Many people find that humanity is basically good, while others believe that humanity is fallen. Does that mean that humanity is evil? Not necessarily. In most cultures, whether you are good or evil is defined by your actions. If you commit acts that are considered evil, like murder or kidnapping or rape, you may be considered evil. If you commit acts that are good, such as providing for your family, or giving to those who have less than you, or being generally helpful and charitable to others, then you will be considered good. Still for others, goodness or evil starts with your heart and mind. If your heart desires good, then you are a "good" person. If your heart desires evil things, then you may be considered "evil."
No he just acts like it him and his men stayed good. he also isn't a clone.
Why my friend, this is a philosophical statement... but it has only one clear cut answer and that is if there is no good then evil cannot be compared and contrasted to anything thus evil acts would be good. That leads us into good existing without evil which is simply stating if ther is no evil then everything is good because of the lack of existence of evil.
There is no such thing as "good evil." Evil is the opposite of good.
It seems to me the moral distinction or demarcation of human acts such as right and wrong, good and bad, must be determined by the views and opinions of the majority at different time and place, taken into account of its prevailing political system and religion as well as its cultural traditions.