Socrates believed that a democracy was not capable of governing effectively because he thought that it allowed the majority to make decisions without considering what is truly just or beneficial for society. He believed that a society should be governed by individuals who were knowledgeable and virtuous, rather than by the whims of the majority.
Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle believed in a form of government where wise and virtuous individuals, such as philosophers, would rule as guardians over society. They promoted the idea of a meritocratic system where those most capable of governing would lead, rather than a democracy where decisions were made by the majority.
Socrates believed that man is a rational and thinking being capable of self-reflection and introspection. He emphasized the importance of questioning and seeking knowledge to better understand oneself and the world around us.
Socrates believed that people were capable of achieving wisdom and virtue through self-examination and critical thinking. He also emphasized the importance of questioning commonly accepted beliefs and values to arrive at a deeper understanding of oneself and the world.
Socrates' philosophy emphasizes self-examination, seeking wisdom, and questioning assumptions. This influence may lead to a view of man as a being capable of critical thinking, self-improvement, and moral development through introspection and dialogue. It can inspire a perspective that values intellectual curiosity, humility, and ethical integrity in understanding human nature.
Aristotle believed that the best form of government was a polity, or constitutional government, where virtuous and capable individuals from the middle class ruled in the interest of the common good. He believed that a combination of democracy and aristocracy was the ideal form of government, as it would prevent the excesses and deficiencies of either extreme.
Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle believed in a form of government where wise and virtuous individuals, such as philosophers, would rule as guardians over society. They promoted the idea of a meritocratic system where those most capable of governing would lead, rather than a democracy where decisions were made by the majority.
Yes.
Plato believed that only philosophers were capable of governing societies.
No, that would be a direct democracy. Locke believed in represenative democracies in which people elected people to represent them.
president Andrew Jackson 1828 Maryam Almansi
Giving every citizen a vote (democracy) would make for flawed results since they did not believe the average person was capable of making sound decisions about government. That's why America is a Republic (aka Representative Democracy) rather than a pure democracy. The idea was that only capable men would run to be electors and they would make better decisions than the masses.
The civil service examination system
yes i do believe that people are capable of genuine change because i myself experience that..
They they capable, they saw for the whole war.
John Locke
Socrates believed that man is a rational and thinking being capable of self-reflection and introspection. He emphasized the importance of questioning and seeking knowledge to better understand oneself and the world around us.
Socrates believed that people were capable of achieving wisdom and virtue through self-examination and critical thinking. He also emphasized the importance of questioning commonly accepted beliefs and values to arrive at a deeper understanding of oneself and the world.