Saint-Simon's structure for leading society emphasized the importance of industrial and scientific experts to guide and organize society. He believed that these experts would provide the necessary knowledge and expertise to solve social problems and improve the well-being of the population. Additionally, Saint-Simon advocated for a system that rewarded merit and contributions to society, rather than traditional social hierarchies based on birth and privilege.
Plato believed that philosopher kings possess wisdom, knowledge, and foresight to make just and informed decisions for the betterment of society. He thought that their pursuit of truth and virtue would lead them to govern selflessly and with the best interests of the people in mind, ultimately leading to a harmonious and just society.
Humanists wanted to reform society by promoting education, critical thinking, and human potential. They believed that by emphasizing reason, ethics, and individualism, society could progress and create a better world for all. They aimed to empower individuals to think independently and make positive contributions to society.
Socrates believes that citizens of Athens should be ashamed because he thought they were more focused on wealth, power, and material possessions than on developing their moral character and pursuing knowledge and truth. He thought that they were neglecting what was truly important in life, leading to a society that was morally corrupt and intellectually stagnant.
Philosophy helps individuals to think critically, analyze complex ideas, and question assumptions, leading to a deeper understanding of oneself, society, and the world. It fosters intellectual growth, encourages ethical reflection, and promotes tolerance for diverse perspectives, enriching and enhancing our lives.
Nietzsche believed that the idea of God had lost its significance and influence in modern society due to advances in science, reason, and individualism. He argued that traditional religious beliefs no longer provided a meaningful framework for understanding the world, leading to a "death of God" metaphorically speaking. This shift left a void that needed to be filled with new values and interpretations of existence.
One of the differences between structure and classes socially is that structure is the organization of society, and classes are the stratification within that society. Think of it like a closet, and the different styles of clothes within the closet.
It taught people their place in society.
Saint Simon envisaged a secular humanist religion to replace the traditional religions with scientists as instructors. I do not believe this would work, as it eliminates faith and hope, which are two instinctual parts of the human society
I think it is a shell structure.
i think you mean "pest to society"
Karl Marx believed that the economic system, specifically the mode of production, defined the social structure of society. He argued that the division of labor and the ownership of the means of production created classes and determined social relationships.
Generally agriculture was what led to the formation of civilisation. Farming required a settled society and enabled the formation of more complex social structure, create a production surplus. The term civilisation refers to the process of a society developing into a centralized, urbanized, stratified structure. It is a society with a centralised state, a state ideology, taxation, social division into classes, specialisation of labour and monumental architecture.
i think because it a non compleat structure i think because it a non compleat structure
They want to control society and how they think.
I don't think you can restart your pet society -_-
the opportunity for middle-class women to think about society
I think its a mass structure:)