The discipline of philosophy sprung from various minds having different life experiences which helped to mold their way of thinking; their way of explaining life's vagaries. So, who is to say which model is correct? One point of view can be just as valid as the next. There is no empirical evidence to say which thinkers' viewpoint is the absolute correct one.
Whereas, science deals in hard verifiable facts which have been replicated by other scientists following the same experiment parameters. A fact, in science has been nailed down three ways from center using the Scientific Method, before it can be labelled as scientific fact.
Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy that examines the foundations, methods, and implications of science. It explores questions about the nature of scientific knowledge, the scientific method, and the relationship between science and other areas of human inquiry.
Most scientists and most philosophers would not consider philosophy to be a science. However, both science and philosophy are characterized by very careful thought and analysis and scholarship. Both are engaged in an effort to understand the universe in which we live. However, scientists emphasize observation, while philosophers emphasize abstract thought. There is certainly some overlap between these subjects, and there is even such a subject as the philosophy of science. There is not, however, a science of philosophy.
Yes, science can be used to evaluate philosophy by providing empirical evidence and logical reasoning to support or refute philosophical ideas.
Philosophy is not considered a science in the traditional sense because it does not rely on empirical methods like observation and experimentation. Instead, it focuses on questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language that are often beyond the scope of scientific inquiry. It can be seen as a distinct and complementary discipline to the sciences.
Science without philosophy has no guide (is blind). It researches pointless things rather than what we want to know, like the origin of the universe and how to stop global warming. Philosophy without science has no substance (is empty): As an example, more than 2000 years ago, the Grecian philosopher Democritus came up with the idea of atoms, but it was just an idea without meaning until science developed to support his theory. We are just in a position to understand what is philosophy and science.Just may be a drop in the ocean. So let us allow the younger with their beliefs.Tomorrow these beliefs may correct.
James H. Fetzer has written: 'Philosophy and Cognitive Science' 'Philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy 'Computers and cognition' -- subject(s): Cognitive science 'Glossary of epistemology/philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Dictionaries, Knowledge, Theory of, Philosophy, Science, Theory of Knowledge 'Artificial intelligence' -- subject(s): Artificial intelligence 'Philosophy and cognitive science' -- subject(s): Philosophy and cognitive science
Philosophy is a science by it self.Human society is a laboratory for its experiments.
Philosophy is no longer a field of Science at all. Science, specifically Physics, did develop from Philosophy, and other Sciences developed from Physics. This (above) explains the term "PhD" (Doctor of Philosophy) and "Physician". There are many differences between Philosophy and Science. The most important is probably that Science deals exclusively with physical objects (living or not), while Philosophy has a wider area of concern. Also, in Science, questions can (often) be answered by performing an experiment. If everyone agrees that the experiment was designed and done well, the results are accepted as "the correct answer." It is not like that in Philosophy.
Unlike science, philosophy is not based on observable truths or known facts.
Political science IS a philosophy. It is the study of how people form politics and policies.
Morality is a branch of philosophy, not science.
Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy that examines the foundations, methods, and implications of science. It explores questions about the nature of scientific knowledge, the scientific method, and the relationship between science and other areas of human inquiry.
"Is semantics a Philosophy or a science" is a question of concern. In order to answer it we , firstly, need to know about philosophy and science. Philosophy, in simple words, is knowledge. It is a rational investigation of truths and principles of being, knowledge or conduct. Science, on the other hand, is the emperical evidence of knowledge. These evidence, are based on experience or observation. Though observation or experience or experiment the knowledge we get is called science. When we know know what philosophy and science are, we can nominate semantics both. Semantic is philosophy and science as well. We know that semantics is the study of meaning. It is meaning of the words and sentences as well. When we say that semantic is a philosophy, it means we know the
Luciano Floridi has written: 'Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy' 'The need for gnoseology' 'The philosophy of information' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Information science 'Philosophy and Computing' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Computer science
Arthur Zucker has written: 'Introduction to the Philosophy of Science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy
Robert A. Solo has written: 'The philosophy of science, and economics' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy
Lisa Bortolotti has written: 'An introduction to the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy