A slave owner may want a slave who had lost hope because they would be less likely to resist or attempt to escape. A slave who has lost hope may also be easier to control and manipulate, making them more compliant and submissive. Additionally, a slave with no hope may be seen as less of a threat to the slave owner's authority and power.
The Loisels do not tell Madame Forestier that the necklace is lost because they are afraid of her reaction and the consequences of admitting their mistake. They hope to find a way to replace the lost necklace without her knowing, to avoid embarrassment and potential financial burden.
"Belief in oneself can be the most powerful force for achieving success."
In the philosophical branch known as ethics, every decision has an ethical component. In the colloquial sense, a decision that is "moral" as opposed to "immoral" is one that would adhere to the normative metric of a given ethical system. Under utilitarianism, a decision that generates the greatest utility for the greatest number would be colloquially "moral. "
Daniel Webster's statement emphasizes the importance of effective communication as a tool to potentially regain everything that was lost. It underscores the power of communication in influencing outcomes and getting one's needs met, suggesting that with the ability to communicate effectively, one can work towards regaining what was taken.
It is hard to say, as there are different angles. It is not clearly stated when the story took place in nineteenth century Paris. if telephones were up and running- and say if this was the nineties- surely that was the style- she would, methinks,call the owner of the necklace up and explain exactly what happened- how the gems were accidentally lost- my guess is then the owner would explain to Mme Loisel that there was no worry and it was costume jewelry- or ( paste) as it is described in the story- the repayment and crash dive into poverty would have never happened- Honesty is the best policy. My guess if the author wanted to make fun of (society crashers) using gimmicks- in effect inverting the Cinderella plot device. O. Henry did a similar story about a bungled inheritance scheme- that was foiled by history- All iof the Money was Confederate. It takes two to swindle- assume that MMe Loisel immediately infomed ( my guess by telephone) the circumstances of the loss- she probably would have explained it was a (wearing copy) and that would end the story right there. By the way wearing copies of such things as Gold and Platinum war medals were worn by officers in the field and also by diplomats at Press conferences- to avoid loss.
Nat Tuner's rebellion was when Nat turner was getting hit by his slave owner for no reason and then he just started fighting back and then he chocked the slave owner so hard he lost the blood in his fingers and then after that the slave owner never touched Nat turner again
the owner didnt take him there his owner died and he fled. his name is Dred Scott and he lost the dred Scott case.
He was a slave-owner. He was not the most brilliant tactician as a general- that he might have lost the war without the help of Lafayette.
call and ask
When you lose the bill of sale the first step would be trying to locate the owner. If the owner can not be located, the following step would be to file for abandoned title.
Their is no owner.
Ask at all the places it might have been lost. In the UK, ask at the local Police Office.
"How can you get a wedding band that you found at a Knicks game back to the owner?" Wow! Trouble in paradise..heheheeee (smile) I would contact the office of lost and found inside the stadium and speak with a member of office management. I would leave my contact information for the owner at lost and found. It is very likely the owner will contact the stadium and inquire with lost and found. I would also place an add in the local city paper and once the owner claimed the ring I'd ask that she/he reimburse the fee for advertising the return of the wedding ring. I would also give the owner 120 days from the date the ring was lost and entered into your possession before declaring ownership. After all possession is 9/10th of the law. Best Wishes
You should help them out. If you lost a loved one would she do the same. I hope this helps you. I hope your friend gets better.
hope is a great healer if you lost hope you lost everything.
Legally speaking, the old adage "Finders keepers" doesn't apply. Lost property still belongs to its rightful owner as long as they have an active interest in it. The intent of the owner is key to lost items.
The previous owner goes to the department of motor vehicles and fills out some paperwork. Then he pays a fee. You go with him and sign the paperwork for a new title, and pay a fee. If he had not lost the original title, he would not need to go to the department, fill out the paperwork, and pay the lost title fee. The original owner must go to the DMV to get a duplicate. In some states the owner can sign an application form for a duplicate and anyone can take it to the DMV but the title will still be issued to the original owner.